What is an opinion essay?
An opinion essay is an essay where the
writer forms an opinion about a topic, often in the form of an answer to a
question, and uses factual and anecdotal evidence to support that opinion. The purpose of this essay type is to
elicit your opinion on particular topics and issues. An opinion essay is basically a formal piece of writing. In this, you
are required to express your viewpoints along with good arguments and justified
reasons.
You can express your opinion in the fowling ways:
,In my opinion,
Personally, I think/ I believe (that)
I strongly believe that….
It is clear (to me) that
I (completely) agree/disagree with …
It seems to me that…
As I see it, …
In my view, ...
From my point of view, …
As far I am concerned, ...
I am sure/ convinced that………..
I (dis)agree with the statement, because …
Structure
1) Introduction
Paraphrase the question
Give your opinion
State two supporting reasons
2) Main body paragraph 1
Topic sentence – outline 1st reason
for supporting this view
Explanation – explain this idea
Example – give an example or
expand the idea
3) Main body paragraph 2
Topic sentence – outline 2nd reason for supporting this view
Explanation – explain this idea
Example – give an example or
expand the idea
4) Conclusion
Summarise opinion and key reasons
Sample 1
In some countries,
an increasing number of people are suffering from health
problems as a result of eating too much fast food.
It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher
tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your
arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
In many nations, there are a number of people who are facing issues
related to their health because they eat junk food daily. Thus, governments
should levy a high tariff on food fast items. This essay agrees with this
statement because a higher cost can result in lower consumption of fast food
and extra taxes collected can be used to treat sick people.
Firstly, a higher tax on fast food eatables will make these items costly,
and it would not be feasible for many people to afford this kind of food. This
will result in many people deter to eat junk food on a daily basis
and lower consumption of this kind of food. For example, a recent study by
Cambridge University found that if prices of fast-food items increased by 10%
of their current value, nearly 30% of people will stop eating junk food
regularly.
Secondly, many people are suffering from health-related issues such as
obesity, immune system and so on due to eating fast food, this will put a
financial strain on the healthcare system. Money collected by imposing higher
taxes can be used to treat sick people. This will lessen the financial burden
on the annual budget spent on the healthcare system. To illustrate, in Britain,
the authorities have imposed 12% more tax on junk food, and higher prices of
this kind of food resulted in lower consumption of fast food.
In conclusion, higher taxes on fast-food items is required to reduce its
consumption because it will make this kind of food costly and funds collected
from taxes can be used to treat sick people. ( 269 words)
Sample 2
Most artists earn low
salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for
them to continue with their work
TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE?
It often said that the income of almost
artists is relatively low. Thus, they should be given funding from government
to maintain their work. From my perspective I completely agree with this point
of view for the following reasons.
Nowadays many gifted artists are facing financial strain and wondering whether
they should follow their enthusiasm in art or doing something else to make out
money. Funding for artists is a best solution for them to clear their way and
work on art continuously. Doing this means artists no longer have to work on
two more extra jobs to cover their personal expense. Working regardless of
money must give them a fresh mind that could produce fascinating and creative
concepts that could be priceless.
Another good point to support artists is that it will benefit society in long
run. Talented artists would create a work of historical or cultural art which
are used as an educational resource that help people to approach them
effectively. Moreover, utilizing art is the most effective way to maintain
history and culture of a country which every country is trying to reserve. In
addition, art galleries are the epitome of artists' production that attract
enormous tourists around the world every year generating a considerable revenue
in return. Obviously, it boosts national tourism industry.
In conclusion, even though funding for artist takes a part government's budget
away but it definitely is worthy. It not only gives artists a huge support to
build their career but benefit the country itself. (252 words)
Sample 3
Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has
a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any
significant influence on people's behaviour. What is your opinion?
Choose your opinion & generate arguments
These days, the amount of violence in media is growing. While some people
argue that this trend will undoubtedly lead humans to dangerous future, others
claim that it has no damaging effect on the society. I believe that in most
cases media violence doesn't affect people's behavior.
Firstly, I think that people act from their motives, regardless what they
see on the television. That is to say, if someone intends to do harm to
somebody, that is not because of watching TV or playing computer games, but due
to that person's character and education. Although it is generally considered
that violent media accustoms viewers to cruelty, I doubt this opinion. In my
view, reasonable and intelligent people treat others humanely irrespective of
what they see or hear in fictional stories.
Moreover, video games and television may even reduce social violence by
providing a safe outlet for aggressiveness. In other words, truculent people
may fight in virtual reality instead of evincing their combative spirit in real
world. This may not only help those people, but also reduce the level of social
violence in long-term perspective.
Finally, despite many claims and assumptions about negative effects of
television and computer games I have never seen any proven connection between
violent media and illegal activities in social life.
Taking everything into consideration, I would say that violence in
contemporary media has no substantial influence on people's behavior.
Television and computers are not the main factors that shape personal
character, and they can even be useful in reducing the level of violence. (257
words
Sample 4
In the future, it
seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be
spent on researching other planet to live on, such as Mars. To what extent do
you agree or disagree with this statement? OR
In the future it may be necessary for us to live on other
planets. For this reason, some people believe that we should spend money now to
research other planets, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that living on earth is becoming more and more
difficult. Therefore, we have to research for another planet to live. In my
opinion, although I believe that it will be hard to live on earth in the
future, the searching for the new planet is not necessary.
On the one hand, there are mainly two reasons why life on earth will be
unsustainable. One obvious problem is that the rising level of pollution in the
land and the ocean which leads to the disproportionate number of the population
in these areas. For example, with the polluted ocean, there will be no fish to
catch. As a result, fishermen and people who live near the beach will have to
move to other areas to survive. Another factor is the overconsumption of
natural resources. When the fossil fuels such as oil and coal are exploited to
meet the mass demand for energy, they will quickly run out. Unfortunately, it
takes ages for these resources to recover
On the other hand, I believe that discovering the new planet is a waste
of money. There are various urgent problems which directly affect people's
lives that we should consider. One of which is to improve the advances of
technology in farming and therefore to reduce the risk of famine. Furthermore,
people still have enough time to save the earth, by replacing fossil fuels with
environmental-friendly and renewable energy such as wind or solar power, we
will reduce the rate of global warming. Take Rex hotel as a simple example;
they are now using trucks with the oil made from corns to minimize the number
of emissions.
In conclusion, although it is getting harder and harder to live on the
earth, I still believe that there are many ways to deal with this problem
rather than to search for another planet to live.
Sample 5
Students in schools and universities learn more from their teachers than
through other means such as the Internet, libraries, and TV. To what extent you
agree or disagree?
Nowadays, new technologies, such as the Internet and television, has made
great changes in education. In spite of this, many people still believes that
traditional education system is more useful when it comes to impart knowledge
on students. In my personal opinion, although the role of teachers in the
classroom is undeniably essential, we still cannot ignore other sources of
learning.
Teachers cannot only inculcate theoretical knowledge to students, but
also instill high moral values and give students inspiration and encouragement.
In other words, teachers serve as a guide for students, by showing them the
path, give them the interpretation, encourage them to think critically and
correct the misunderstandings. However, it is also true that not all teachers
are qualified and not everyone can go to schools and universities. For
instance, some students are afraid of entering the classroom because of the bad
impression of teachers or some others, due to personal or economic reasons,
cannot attend universities.
For those kinds of students, they might feel more comfortable learning
with the Internet or television. The easy access to other learning resources
has allowed students to learn any subject they are interested in at any time of
the day. Moreover, stimulating and complementing the learning experience by
employing different sources of information is also beneficial for students. For
instance, by doing research as an assignment for school or university, pupils
are forced to read additional material of the topic in order to complete the
task, and this kind of extra material are mostly available online. Thus, they
are learning with other sources.
In conclusion, the important role of educators is acknowledged due to
their irreplaceable contribution in any student's learning journey. But equal
importance should be given to alternative sources of information during
children's development.
Sample 6
Some people believe that international trade and communication with other
countries is a positive trend, while others think it is harmful to nations and
they might lose their identities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with
this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.
In recent years, the issue of whether trading and interaction between
nations is harmful to countries or not has become a contentious issue. Despite
the arguments of some people that international trade is undermining people's
recognition of their identities, it is my personal belief that interaction
between different regions in the world are unavoidable, meanwhile, facilitate
nations' development.
For a start, the notions of international communication and trade are
prevalent that no one is able to avoid it. Cooperating with other regions on
business in the world manages to fill the lacks of resources such the newest
medicine, advanced technology and meager sources. even the isolated country,
North Korea need to conduct some commercial exchanges with China or other
related countries to consolidate their own powers in different fields. other
parts of the world are not able to stop the connection with other countries as
their power will be significantly sabotaged without international trade. As a
results, it is of paramount importance to maintain an interaction or trading
with other countries in order to enhance the competitiveness in the world.
However, someone may worry that this kind of globalization is detrimental
to nations that it will be at the expense of citizens' nation identities. it
seems to me that one's identities cannot be altered easily as the cultures and
languages are something that have already adopt. When foreign cultures are
received by the locals, it will be only a recognition of a new culture but do
not affect their identities of their own cultures and nations. In addition,
even though without international exchanges, public can access others' cultures
through internet or other paths, therefore, it is not effective to isolate
themselves for protection countries' own identities.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my view that international trade and
communication is worthwhile. Not only do it underpin a country's power, but it
also is an unavoidable trend.
Sample
7
Some people think that men and
women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for
men and some jobs are suitable for women.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that women and men have
different strengths and weaknesses and as a result of that some certain jobs
are suitable for men and some certain jobs are suitable for women. I do not
agree with this opinion.
Before the Second World War, the labour
force was dominated by the males. Female workers could find a very little area
in the job market to work but during and after the Second World War producers
needed waste amount of labour force to keep their facilities running. Because
of a certain number of men was in the military services, they started to hire
female workers. Especially in the USA. This was the first time which the female
workers show they can do the same job with male workers. After the following
years, female workers became more qualified and they started to penetrate
higher positions. In the seventies and eighties, females were all over the job
market and in any position. That shows us that if they have given
opportunities, women can do any job which a man can do. Some people thought
that the women have physical weaknesses according to men and that prevented to
do jobs which need physical endurance. That opinion is old fashioned and wrong.
In the times of Second World War nearly all the jobs which needed physical endurance
were getting done by the women in the USA and also in the USSR- before the
Soviet Union had collapsed, even the mining operations were getting done by the
women. Another example in the same kind of situation is about the textile
business. In the 19th century, the labour force in textile works was
dominated by the men but today women have outnumbered men in that area.
Other tan this opinion, some people
believe that the man can't do the jobs which need gentleness. This idea is also
wrong. The best example of the wrongness of this idea is kindergarten teachers
and nurses. In the seventies and eighties, there were nearly no male
kindergarten teachers or nurses, even in the well-developed countries like USA
or Canada but after nineties men started to work as kindergarten teachers or
nurses. Today, even in the developing countries like Turkey or Mexico you can
see many male kindergarten teachers or nurses. In the republic of Ireland, a
man who is a former tax lawyer is trying to be Olympic synchronized swimmer and
that shows us the gender is not an issue about doing a job.
As a conclusion, in today’s world women
and men can capable of doing any jobs. Excluding a male or a female from a
certain profession because of his or her gender doesn't have any logical
reason. Believing a gender is not a suitable for a certain job is just an out
fashioned thought. There is no limitation for the men and women in the job
market except prejudice.
Sample 8
Some people think that
success is the best measure of intelligence, while others think that
intelligence can be measured in other ways more effectively.
What is your opinion on this?
Give reasons for your answer and include
any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Intelligence is a multifaceted trait that
can be difficult to quantify. While some individuals believe that success is
the ultimate gauge of intelligence, others argue that there are more effective
methods to evaluate it. In my view, intelligence can be measured through
various means beyond achievement or success.
Undoubtedly, success can be an indication
of intelligence, but it is not always a reliable measure. Take, for example,
individuals born into affluent families, who may be able to achieve success
through their wealth and connections rather than their intelligence. On the
other hand, there are numerous individuals who do not have the same advantages
but possess immense intelligence that is not reflected in their
achievements. Furthermore, intelligence can be measured in other ways
that are more accurate and objective. For instance, an individual's cognitive
abilities can be assessed through standardized tests that evaluate various
aspects of intelligence, such as logical reasoning, spatial awareness, and
verbal comprehension. Similarly, intelligence can be measured by analyzing an
individual's problem-solving skills, creativity, and critical thinking
abilities.
Moreover, intelligence can be
demonstrated through individuals' ability to adapt to new situations and
environments. This includes their capacity to learn from their experiences and
apply their knowledge to different contexts effectively. A person's intelligence
can also be reflected in their ability to empathize with others, understand
their perspectives, and communicate effectively with them.
In conclusion, while success may be an
indicator of intelligence, it is not the only measure. Intelligence can be
measured in various ways beyond achievement, such as through standardized
tests, problem-solving skills, adaptability, and interpersonal abilities.
Sample 9
"Prevention
is better than cure."Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion
should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and
preventative measures.
There is no
denying the fact that an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure.
This is why it is being argued these days that governments should invest a
majority of their health budgets in creating awareness about preventative
measures rather than providing a cure for diseases. Since health education and
awareness about preventative measures offer more benefits than providing
treatment, this essay agrees that nations must concentrate on preventative
instead of curative measures.
There
are several arguments to substantiate this viewpoint. First and foremost,
investments made in the prevention of diseases will save people’s money.
Treating any sickness is becoming increasingly expensive these days. For
instance, the prices of several life-saving drugs are rocketing sky-high.
Similarly, treatment of any illness requires diagnosis but, in many countries,
doctors show reluctance to use their knowledge and expertise to diagnose even
minor ailments and instead prescribe patients many unnecessary and costly
tests. This has made the incredibly expensive health care beyond the reach of
many ordinary people. Therefore, if the government channels most of its health
funds in the prevention of diseases, people can be saved from enormous health bills.
Likewise, spending money on creating awareness about health will also reduce
the financial/ monetary burden on the government’s shoulders. As government has
to spend its limited resources on various crucial aspects such as providing
education, developing infrastructure and conducting social welfare schemes,
providing treatment to a large number of people at affordable prices in
state-funded hospitals will result in a severe shortage of funds. To generate
more funds, the government will have to either levy heavier taxes or reduce its
spending on other areas. In both scenarios, the one who will be at a
disadvantage is the common man. For instance, a rise in the taxes will give
birth to inflation which will make it extremely difficult for people to afford even
the basic necessities of life. Similarly, if spending on other crucial areas is
curtailed, many people, who rely on governmental help, will suffer a lot.
In
addition, despite the existence of a cure, the treatment for a malady can make
life inconvenient in several ways as it can cause needless pain and suffering.
In exemplification, treating cancer using chemotherapy results in many
side-effects such as loss of hair, nausea, vomiting, skin infection, fatigue
and so on. On top of that, some diseases are incurable and most often result in
a person’s demise. A perfect example of this would be HIV which has no viable
cure as of yet. Sometimes, therapeutic and surgical intervention fails to
produce the desired results. Such failures make people lifelong dependent on
costly and unnecessary drugs and also exert an enormous emotional toll on the
patient and his/her family. Absenteeism from school and work due to various
ailments is another good example to justify the argument that prevention is
much better than cure. Although it cannot be guaranteed that the funds directed
towards prevention will yield fruitful results, it is undeniable that we need
to try to implement such measures.
To conclude, a healthy citizenry is the
real wealth of a nation. By preventing diseases, people can enjoy happy and
peaceful life. In a world of scarce resources, spending money on developing
costly diagnostic and therapeutic techniques is a waste as long as prevention
of diseases is an achievable goal. Thus, it is far more judicious to spend
money on prevention rather than cure.
Sample 10
It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional
cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible - you cannot
have both together.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
Technology, the buzzword of today, has
improved the quality of life world over. It is true that technology is one of
the reasons behind the abrupt destruction of our traditional culture. In my
point of view, technology and our tradition go well together.
Firstly, traditional games from the
bygone days have been evaded by the juvenile and by the grown-up. They are much
attracted towards video games rather than ancient games. According to them,
these are old-fashioned games. An axiom for this issue is to include
traditional games into the video games so that younger generation will get
exposure to it. In addition, traditional musical instruments such as banjos are
being replaced by new innovations such as guitars, pianos and so on. Apart from
this, the numbers of traditional performances organized have also been reduced
due to the invention of idiot box which always broadcast a variety of TV shows
and serials, making less importance to the traditional performance.
In this era of globalization, people
prefer to live in modern apartments. So usages of traditional houses have
become comparatively less. Unlike traditional houses, flats offering much
secure environment. Moreover, apartment helps to reduce vicissitudes of our
life. To have an ancient touch, one can include traditional concepts and
furniture while building the apartments.
In conclusion, the strong current of
technological advancement has indeed eroded some traditions; nevertheless, both
of them are not mutually incompatible. We can preserve our traditions which
reflect our origins and roots but at the same time manage to develop our
country with full utilization of technology as it could be used to reinstate
traditions.
No comments:
Post a Comment