IELTS Discussion Essay / Discuss Both View Essay
A discussion essay presents and
discusses issues surrounding a particular topic--usually one that is debatable
and open to argument. A good discussion essay must include a thorough
discussion of both sides of the topic. It should provide a well-rounded understanding
of the issues before the writer presents his personal opinions and conclusions.
As with most persuasive essay formats, the discussion essay's quality relies
primarily on the writer's ability to provide solid research and evidence to
present different views of the topic.
You will then be asked to discuss
both sides of the argument and give your own opinion. Here is some typical
wording that might be used:
• Discuss
both views and give your opinion.
• Discuss
both these views and then give your own opinion.
• Discuss
both sides of this argument and give your own opinion.
Structure
1) Introduction
Paraphrase
the question
State
two supporting reasons
Give your opinion
2) Main
body paragraph 1
Topic
sentence – State the first view
Explanation
– explain why this view is held by some people
Example
– give an example to support this view
3) Main
body paragraph 2
Topic
sentence – State the second view
Explanation
– explain why this view is held by some people
Example
– give an example to support this view
4) Conclusion
Summarise
the key points and state your opinion
Sample 1
Some parents believe that cell phones are harmful to children,
while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is
often argued by some father and mother that the usage of mobiles is detrimental
to young person, whereas others believe that it is beneficial. Whilst a
discussion of both these views is worthwhile, I am a supporter of the former
view.
On the one hand, it is opined by
some parents that cell phones are unsafe for juveniles as it will make them to
distract from their studies. In other words, they will be glued with the
devices by watching unwanted websites which will consequently impact their
education by getting lower scores. In addition, it will indulge them to get
into a trap or do some wrong activities by connecting to unknown person as a
friend in the social media. For example, a recent survey conducted by the
Indian government reports that 80% of crime such as child and women abuse, or
rape had occurred because of the networking with illegal contact in the
Facebook or Twitter. In my opinion, I agree with the above notion because it is
risky for younger ones to use the mobile phones as it will ruin their career at
an early age.
On the other hand, it is believed
by some that it is safe for the children to use because it will be used in the
case of emergencies. That is to say that they can call their elders when they
met with any accidents or lost in someplace. Furthermore, it will help them to
learn new things and acquire knowledge with the help of Google software. For
instance, in the US, most of the juniors call their parents when they were lost
or trapped by someone which will aid them to be saved by the police.
However, I do not support this
notion as the drawback of the cell phones override its benefits because it will
influence them to commit crimes.
In conclusion, although it is
believed by some that it will secure them from the danger, I reiterate that it
is harmful for the minors, which will affect their future growth by disobeying
their parents and involving in them in crime activities. (353 words)
Sample 2
Some people believe that
teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects. But others believe that
teenage should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find the
most interest.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is considered by some that
juveniles ought to pay attention to all subjects in the school curriculum while
others think that they should put more effort in the subjects in which they
perform well and are interested. In my opinion, I believe that teens must focus
on all the different subjects rather than the ones which they are good at.
On the one hand, some think that
minors should concentrate on all subjects and I agree. As the school curriculum
has a wide variety of subjects which include the academic as well as the extra
curriculum activities, It helps in the child’s overall development and they
become an all-rounder’s. In other words, paying attention to all the subjects
in school, let the children have a variety of options to choose for their
future as they are still a very young age to decide a particular subject, as
their subject of interest and continue it for a lifetime. Moreover, knowledge
of every subject is necessary even in our daily lives for instance, simple
mathematical calculations are required for grocery shopping to check and
calculate the amount spent.
On the other hand, others believe
that if the teenagers are interested and are performing well in a particular
subject, they should focus more on it thus, considering that subject for their
future studies. Focusing on subjects that students find interesting can
provide them with some advantages. First, if they feel passionate about a given
subject, they will easily get along with the content and the topics involved
since they are studying what they really like and enjoy. Consequently, they
could reach better results and develop new skills for future studies. Also,
when students focus on only a subject that they are good at, they can easily
deepen into a specific area, knowing whether they want continue with the same
track while getting new capacities and skills.
In my opinion, taking only one
subject can restrict their options for further studies if their interests
change and they will be left with no options, but to continue it. This can
discourage them and may even lose interest in studies.
In conclusion, minors should be
interested in all subjects in school as later on they have many options to
decide from and will not be stuck with only one subject which they may dislike
later.
Sample 3
Computers are being used more
and more in education. Some people say that this is a positive trend, while
others argue that it is leading to negative consequences.
Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion
Teaching methodology and pedagogy
have undergone a drastic change over period of time. Some people believe use of
computers in the education sector is a welcome change while others have an
opposite opinion about it. This essay will discuss why usage of computer in the
education sector has adverse ramifications but why its usage also brings out
superior constructive consequences.
Introduction of computers in the
schools seems to bring in ill effects for students and society. For students it
not only has detrimental impact on their eyes but also weakens the student
teacher relationship. For instance, students and teacher these days do not talk
directly but via computer. In addition, with all assignments and examinations
going online students have completely forgotten to write. Unfavorable
consequences of technology are increasingly being discussed among critics.
On the other hand, computers and
laptops have brought in a positive change in the way learning happens. These
devices provide various tools and techniques like Microsoft excel to analyze
and present the data in a beautiful manner. For example, Microsoft power point
is a strong tool to showcase the research related findings in a graphical and
attractive manner. In addition, availability of all the past information in the
same device eradicates the need of searching old notebooks at home. These
positive trends are increasingly becoming popular in various schools.
In conclusion, way of teaching has
seen remarkable changes throughout. This essay discussed why use of computers
in education domain is seen as negative but why opposite side is brighter and
advantageous. In my opinion, use of computers have brought in blissful changes
in the teaching methods. (270 words)
Sample 4
Some people spend a lot of money
for their wedding ceremonies. However, others feel like it is unnecessary to
spend a lot. Discuss both view points and give your own opinion.
Some people prefer to have a
lavish wedding and they do not mind spending a lot of money on it. Others opine
that such celebrations are a waste of money. I agree with this view. In my
opinion, one can save this money and utilise it for better purposes.
An elaborate / expensive wedding
has many benefits. For example, it creates memories that the couple can
remember for their life. It is also an opportunity for young people to
celebrate their happiness with their friends and family. Consequently, many
people spend too much money on this occasion to make it memorable and to show
off their wealth and status. Moreover, such occasions give family members and
friends an opportunity to get together.
On the flip side, a big wedding
can also waste a lot of money. Couples can achieve better things in their life
with this money. For example, they can invest it for their children’s
education. There are some people who take loans to celebrate their marriage
lavishly. They have to grapple with the debt for years to come and that will
take away all the joy in their life.
Another disadvantage of lavish weddings is that they spur competition. When
someone holds an extravagant wedding celebration for themselves or their
children, their friends and neighbours will feel compelled to do so. This
mentality will eventually lead to a lot of problems in the society.
To conclude, although many people
believe that spending a lot of money for marriages would bring happiness and
contentment, I personally think that such occasions are a waste of money.
Saving this money for use in the future is a much better idea. ( 279 words)
Sample 5
Some
people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to
travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only
reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.
Discuss
both these views and give your own opinion.
Language acquisition has long been
a subject of debate, with some asserting that its sole purpose lies in
facilitating travel or employment abroad, while others argue that it serves
broader intellectual and cultural purposes. This essay will explore both
perspectives and present my stance on the matter emphasizing that learning a
foreign language brings multifaceted advantages beyond utilitarian aspects.
On the one hand, those who believe
that proficiency in a foreign language should be solely for employment and
travel opine that we should learn a second language to enhance our
communication skills during travel or work in foreign countries. For instance, fluency
in Spanish allows individuals to immerse themselves in the rich cultures of
various Latin American countries, fostering meaningful connections with locals
and gaining a deeper appreciation for their traditions. Moreover, being
bilingual or multilingual opens up a plethora of job opportunities in
international organizations, diplomacy, and tourism sectors, where language
skills are highly valued.
On the other hand, others believe
asserting that learning a foreign language is solely for practical purposes
overlooks the intrinsic value of this endeavour. Mastering another language
broadens one's horizons and nurtures a deeper understanding of diverse
worldviews. For example, delving into the nuances of Japanese grammar and
culture enables learners to appreciate the intricacies of traditional Japanese
literature, such as haiku or tanka, and thereby fosters a profound cultural
exchange. Furthermore, language acquisition bolsters cognitive functions,
including memory retention and problem-solving skills. Studies have shown that
bilingual individuals exhibit enhanced cognitive flexibility, as they are
constantly switching between languages and adapting to different linguistic
structures.
In conclusion, while learning a
foreign language facilitates travel and career prospects, its scope transcends
these utilitarian goals. Embracing linguistic diversity nurtures cultural
appreciation, fosters cognitive development, and enriches personal experiences.
Therefore, learning a foreign language is a multifaceted pursuit that opens
doors to a world of opportunities, expands the horizons of understanding, and
broadens our perspectives on global interconnectedness.
Sample
6
Some
people think that the teenage years are the happiest times of most people's
lives. Others think that adult life brings more happiness, in spite of greater
responsibilities.
Discuss both these views
and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for
your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or
experience.
Different individuals have their
own opinion about the happiest phase in human life. According to one camp, the
teenage years are the most joyful times in the individual's life, while
according to the other camp, people are more pleased when they are fully grown
up. In this essay, both outlooks will be critiqued before reaching a reasoned
conclusion.
On the one hand, some people feel
that adolescent life is more joyful than mature years. The reason for believing
this is that the youths do not have any duties and can live a carefree life. In
other words, no one is actually dependent on them and thereby, they can spend
most of the time performing the task they enjoy the most. Thus, it is apparent
that they can feel satisfied with whatever they do and in turn, will always
live a happy life.
On the other hand, there are
groups of individuals who consider adulthood as the most blissful phase of
their life. The people advocate such a concept because they feel that a person
can experience happiness only when they are able to satisfy others' needs. This
means that for such people definition of happiness is being able to fulfil
their responsibilities and the desires of their close ones. Therefore, the
theory of grown-ups with duties being the most contented living creatures is
difficult to debunk.
In conclusion, although having no
responsibilities can help people to stay happy, knowing that they are able to
satisfy their relatives' requirements brings more happiness. Thus, it is seen
that older people are happier than young people.
Sample 7
Some
people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools.
Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed
schools.
Discuss both these views and
give your own opinion.
Nowadays, the co-educational system is considered as the best option in many countries. Some believe that it is better that young females and males study separately, while others mention that studying together can be more beneficial. I will discuss both sides and will give my opinion.
On the one hand, those believing
that education systems should be a separate gender-based system have their own
reasons. One is that this method can be safer. Every year, numerous sexual
offences are reported by the local or national news, regarding of rape or other
inappropriate sexual behaviours, especially in countries permitting both
genders to study in one school. However, studying in single-gender-institutions
can reduce the rate of these figures. As a prime example, thousands of sexual
assaults are reported in the U.S. schools annually but had the government
considered unisex education, these rates would have dramatically decreased.
Another reason is that this system may raise religious conflicts. In some
countries, some opponents are not interested in sending their children to these
types of schools, and this has become hot potato between different religious
groups. For instance, French Islamic citizens prefer their children to study in
a single sex school, whereas the administration admits both genders in one
educational place.
On the other hand, I personally
give a green light to those supporting co-educational system. The first reason
behind it is that this system definitely would be less costly. Clearly, to
divide girls and boys, governments have to spend more money on education
because they cannot use empty spaces of a female school for a male one, or vice
versa. As a result, less educational facilities should be provided for
scholars, declining the total education budget. Furthermore, this method can
improve students’ communication skills. Obviously, having a better relationship
with the opposite sex, juveniles will have a closer relationship not only
during their study but during their matrimonial life. They generally have fewer
marriage problems with their partner due to having a better experience before.
In this way, Sigmund Freud, a very familiar former psychologist, believe that
humans’ social skills are fundamentally developed as they have closer feelings
to their opposite sex during childhood.
In conclusion, although in some
countries co-educational system is not popular, I agree with it. Not only in
this measure more governmental budget can be saved, but youth can have better
relationships with the opposite gender. Hopefully, a global tendency will
propagate this method of education in the near future.
Sample 8
Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that
this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a
whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion.
A healthy diet plays a very
important role in maintaining people’s health. Some people argue that we should
eat no fish and meat to have our own health better and it is also valuable to
the world. In my opinion, I agree that this will bring many advantages but also
causes several drawbacks.
First of all, it is undeniable that by dint of eating like a vegetarian, people will have a nice body and more chance to avoid several chronic diseases. To specify, vegetables and fruits, which contain a rich source of vitamins and minerals, will enable people to keep a fit and healthy body. Moreover, with a low amount of fats, cholesterol, or saturated fats, people will not have to worry about gaining weight or obesity as well as other related health issues like high blood pressure or heart diseases. For example, since I ate more vegetables, my body became stronger and my weight stayed unchanged over time.
Sticking to vegetarian meals, we can contribute to saving the world. In more detail, the fact is that every year, the food processing industry consumes a large amount of clean water to produce meat or beef and release tons of waste and smoke into the environment. Additionally, due to overfishing for food, many species of fish in seas, rivers, lakes are endangered and facing extinction. Therefore, if we remove meat and fish from our meal, we can prevent this.
Though nonveg food items might
have an edge when it comes to having nutritional enrichment, it could be
substituted by umpteen food substitutes available.
In conclusion, it is not always good if we only eat vegetables but we should reduce the amount of meat and fish as well as eat more vegetables for healthier living.
Sample 9
Some people say that the
best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports
facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public
health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views
and give your own opinion.
Many people believe that sports
facilities are essential for improving public health as sporting activity helps
to maintain body diet. But sports facility is not the only solution to improve
public health. While a healthy place lets us live a healthy life, living in a
dirty place and bad foods lead to numbers of health problems. In my opinion,
other measures are required to improve public health along with the increase of
sports facilities.
Sports facilities are very important for public health either directly or
indirectly. If you exercise regularly, you will have less disease than others
who do not exercise at all. Beside this, doctors always prescribe to walk in
the morning for controlling various diseases like diabetes. Moreover, sports
facilities let the children grow healthy and tall. Furthermore, to the fact,
sporting activity keeps you away from getting addicted to alcohol or drugs. So,
the importance of sports facility cannot be ignored in any way.
On the other hand, other measures like reducing water contamination,
environmental pollution, air and sound pollution etc. are important to improve
public health. Doctors always prescribe for fresh air which is very important
for healthiness. Moreover, there are a number of deadly viruses transmits via
air and water. So, if we can reduce air and water pollution, it will help to
improve public health certainly.
Finally, everybody needs to understand the reasons behind health deterioration.
All specialist doctor related to public health emphasises the importance of
pollution free environment, balanced diet as well as an increase of sports
facilities. In my opinion, various measures need to be taken to improve public
health by the appropriate authority rather than concentrating on a particular
issue like increasing sports facilities only.
Sample 10
In today’s competitive world,
many families find it necessary for both parents go out to work. While some say
the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel
they lack support because of their parents’ absence.
Discuss both these views and
give your own opinion.
On one hand, having more than one breadwinner in a family is advantageous for some reasons. First, it is possible for parents to carry out more satisfactory and rewarding childcare. Children in rural areas, for example, are unfortunately denied the chance of going to school because parents’ income is limited. However, these privileged children whose parents are usually economically successful are more likely to succeed in future career. Further, taking care of themselves without parental support is also a good way to develop essential life skills such as self-protection.
While the benefits of having additional income may be true to certain extent, I strongly believe that the lack of family bond due to parents’ absence may pose some threats to their children. First, they are not adequately provided with love and care from their birth givers. Parents who are under tremendous time pressure at work are not sensitive enough to notice any changes in teenagers’ mental life and thus, unable to share their story. In other words, they may feel more distant from the family and become isolated or even autistic. Parents can also lose control over their children considering little amount of time spent with them. As a result, they are likely to indulge in several social evils such as game-addition or drinking.
From the above-mentioned reasons, it seems to me that it is more essential to build a strong family connection in comparison with a financial state. Therefore, parents’ work should be distributed in order to spend more time with their children.
Sample 11
Many people are afraid to leave
their homes because of the fear of crime. Some believe that more actions should
be taken to prevent crime. Others feel that little can be done. Discuss both
views and give your opinion.
The popularity of crime today has
made people stay indoors for self-protection. While it is a common belief that
reducing the crime rate is a nearly impossible mission, I hold the view that
there are certain measures which can convert the world into a safer place to
live in.
On the one hand, many people argue that in such current era of moral decadence, any attempts to prevent crime would turn out to be a failure. Poverty and unemployment are considered chief precursors to law violation, and only when these two social issues are eliminated will crime disappear. However, it is true that a society can only provide a limited number of jobs for its residents, and those who are not lucky enough to receive good education from childhood would find it difficult to pursue a career to make ends meet. Such individuals are lack of both skills and orientation, and from their perspective, becoming a thief might be a better way to survive compared to unstably living on governmental subsidies or performing menial work. It seems that the root of this problem cannot be solved completely, and this is why how to halt law-breaking may remain as an insurmountable question for the government.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that there are still solutions to maintain criminal justice. Firstly, stricter sets of laws are required, and the penalties should be corresponding to the severity of the wrongdoings. In a variety of countries, such as the United Kingdom or Italy, the capital punishment has been abandoned; but I believe it should be reintroduced as the fear of death may deter the potential offenders and stop them from committing serious crime. Secondly, the government should encourage companies and organizations to expand and run more projects. These actions create jobs; therefore, those who live under the poverty line not only do not have to become pickpockets or burglars for survival but also stand a chance to earn a living with their own clean money.
In conclusion, I believe that the aforementioned measures can create more peaceful communities and ensure the safety of the residents.
Sample 12
Some people say that economic
growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that
economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both
views and give your opinion.
It is true that some people contend that
economic growth is the only solution to the global problems of hunger and
poverty. Others, however, argue for an end to economic growth to conserve our
environment. I agree completely with this second view.
Those who see economic growth alone as the sole cure for the tragedy of world hunger and poverty propose one major argument. Only the growth of the economies of developing countries will provide the poor with the wealth to afford the basic necessities of life. The profits made by corporations that are responsible for this economic growth will trickle down in the form of financial benefits to be enjoyed by the starving and needy. This view has justified the age of imperialism and the destruction of the livelihood of millions in the name of progress.
On the other hand, there are countless examples to support the opposing view that economic growth results in environmental destruction. Firstly, this is true for developing countries, where lowland rainforests have been cleared and unsustainable agricultural practices introduced to produce cash crops, often for export. Secondly, it is also true for developed economies. For example, the continued use of fossil fuels, which provide the energy for growing industrialization, causes global warming. This leads to a rise in sea levels, which will eventually make tens of millions of poor people in Bangladesh homeless.
In conclusion, economic growth which is not sustainable must be stopped. If it is not based on meeting human needs rather than generating profits, such growth will only create more poverty and lead to more hunger in the world by destroying natural resources.
Sample 13
Some people believe that living
in big cities is becoming more difficult. Others believe that it is getting
easier. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
The increasing trend of migration towards urban centres is a testament to the allure of city life, promising opportunities and a vibrant environment. However, the urban landscape poses its own set of challenges. This essay will explore the difficulties of city living—congestion and limited access to green spaces—and suggest measures governments can implement to enhance the overall urban experience.
Congestion stands out as a prominent issue in cities, leading to traffic gridlock and inefficient transportation systems. The high density of vehicles contributes to increased travel times, elevated stress levels, and environmental degradation. Urban planning that prioritizes efficient public transportation, invests in alternative mobility solutions such as bike lanes and implements congestion pricing can help alleviate traffic congestion and enhance the overall commuting experience.
Furthermore, the scarcity of green
spaces in cities is a growing concern. Limited access to parks and recreational
areas diminishes residents' opportunities for outdoor activities, exercise, and
relaxation. Green spaces are essential for mental well-being and community
engagement. Governments can address this challenge by incorporating green
infrastructure in urban planning, creating new parks, and revitalizing existing
ones. Such initiatives not only provide a respite from the urban hustle but
also contribute to a healthier and more connected community.
In conclusion, congestion and
limited access to green spaces represent significant challenges in urban
living. Governments can play a pivotal role in addressing these difficulties
through thoughtful urban planning, investment in sustainable transportation
solutions, and a commitment to enhancing green infrastructure. By tackling
these issues comprehensively, cities can evolve into more livable, inclusive,
and sustainable environments for their diverse residents.
No comments:
Post a Comment