PTE Writing Module – Essay Sample Questions (20 Topics)
1. Some people believe that online learning is as effective as classroom
learning. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Introduction
The issue of whether online learning is as effective as classroom learning has
become a matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people
believe that digital education provides the same quality as face-to-face
teaching, others argue that traditional classrooms offer better learning
experiences. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own
opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why online learning can
be considered beneficial. Firstly, it offers flexibility and convenience,
allowing students to study at their own pace and schedule. For instance,
working professionals or individuals with limited mobility can pursue courses
without attending physical classes. Secondly, online platforms provide access
to a wide range of resources, such as recorded lectures, digital libraries, and
interactive tools that support learning. Therefore, it is understandable why
many people support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that classroom
learning is more effective. They claim that face-to-face interaction with teachers
helps students understand difficult concepts more clearly, and provide evidence
such as group discussions and real-time feedback in classrooms. Moreover,
physical classrooms create a structured environment that reduces distractions
and encourages discipline among learners. Consequently, this perspective also
holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have valid points. However, after
careful consideration, I firmly believe that classroom learning is more
effective because it encourages active engagement and provides direct support
from teachers. Hence, it is essential that educational institutions use a
blended approach, combining online tools with traditional methods, for a
balanced and effective learning experience.
2. In many countries, traffic congestion is becoming a major problem. What
are the causes and solutions?
Introduction
The issue of increasing traffic congestion in many countries has become a
matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people believe that
rapid urbanization and rising vehicle ownership are the main causes, others
argue that poor public transport and weak urban planning also contribute
significantly. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my
own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why rising population and
private vehicle use can be considered major causes of traffic congestion.
Firstly, as cities grow, more people rely on personal cars due to convenience
and a lack of reliable alternatives. For example, in many developing countries,
families purchase motorcycles and cars as soon as their income increases,
leading to overcrowded roads. Secondly, urban areas often fail to expand their
road networks at the same pace as population growth, creating bottlenecks
during peak hours. Therefore, it is understandable why many people view these
factors as primary contributors to traffic problems.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing or additional viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who emphasize the role of poor
infrastructure argue that weak public transport and ineffective planning worsen
congestion. They claim that inadequate bus services or outdated rail systems
force people to depend on private vehicles, and provide evidence such as cities
where public transport is unreliable or overcrowded. Moreover, unplanned urban
development, including narrow roads and poorly designed intersections, slows
down traffic flow significantly. Consequently, this perspective also holds
significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument highlight important causes of traffic
congestion. However, after careful consideration, I firmly believe that
improving public transport and implementing smarter urban planning are the most
effective solutions because they reduce dependence on private vehicles and
enhance overall traffic management. Hence, it is essential that governments
invest in modern transportation systems and well-designed road networks for a
balanced and long-term outcome.
3. Technology has made our lives easier, but it has also made people lazy.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Introduction
The issue of whether technology has made our lives easier or contributed to
people becoming lazy has become a matter of considerable debate in recent
times. While some people believe that technological advancements improve
efficiency and convenience, others argue that they reduce physical activity and
personal effort. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my
own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why technology can be
considered highly beneficial. Firstly, it has made daily tasks faster and more
efficient. For example, online banking, digital communication, and smart home
devices save time and effort, allowing people to focus on more important
responsibilities. Secondly, technology has improved productivity in workplaces
through automation and advanced tools, which help businesses, operate smoothly
and accurately. Therefore, it is understandable why many people support this
viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that
technology has made people increasingly lazy. They claim that reliance on
gadgets reduces physical activity, and provide evidence such as people using
elevators instead of stairs or ordering food online instead of cooking.
Moreover, the excessive use of smart phones and computers encourages a
sedentary lifestyle, which can lead to health problems like obesity and poor
posture. Consequently, this perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument present valid points. However, after
careful consideration, I firmly believe that the advantages of technology
outweigh the disadvantages because it improves productivity and enhances
overall quality of life. Hence, it is essential that individuals use technology
responsibly and maintain healthy habits for a balanced outcome.
4. The use of mobile phones in schools should be banned. Do you agree or
disagree?
Introduction
The issue of whether mobile phones should be banned in schools has become a
matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people believe that
banning phones can reduce distractions and improve academic performance, others
argue that mobile devices can be useful educational tools. This essay will
discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why banning mobile phones
in schools can be considered beneficial. Firstly, phones often distract
students from their studies, as they may use them to play games, browse social
media, or chat with friends during class. For example, many teachers report
that students struggle to concentrate when phones are allowed. Secondly,
banning phones helps maintain discipline and reduces issues such as cheating
during exams or cyber bullying. Therefore, it is understandable why many people
support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that mobile
phones can support learning when used appropriately. They claim that phones
provide quick access to online dictionaries, educational videos, and research
materials, and provide evidence such as digital classrooms where students use
apps for assignments. Moreover, mobile phones allow students to contact their
parents in emergencies, which can be important for safety. Consequently, this
perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have valid points. However, after
careful consideration, I firmly believe that mobile phones should be restricted
but not completely banned because they can be valuable learning tools when used
responsibly and under supervision. Hence, it is essential that schools create
clear guidelines for mobile phone use to ensure a balanced and effective
learning environment.
5. Working from home has become increasingly popular. Discuss the
advantages and disadvantages.
Introduction
The issue of working from home becoming increasingly popular has become a matter
of considerable debate in recent times. While some people believe that remote
work offers flexibility and comfort, others argue that it creates challenges
related to productivity and social interaction. This essay will discuss both
perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why working from home can
be considered advantageous. Firstly, it provides greater flexibility for
employees, allowing them to manage their work schedules while balancing
personal responsibilities. For instance, parents can spend more time with their
children and avoid daily commuting stress. Secondly, remote work helps reduce
transportation costs and environmental pollution, as fewer people travel to
offices every day. Therefore, it is understandable why many people support this
viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that working
from home also has notable disadvantages. They claim that employees may
struggle with distractions at home, such as household chores or family
interruptions, which can reduce productivity. Moreover, the lack of
face-to-face interaction with colleagues may lead to feelings of isolation and
weaker teamwork. Companies often find it difficult to maintain communication
and monitor performance in a completely remote environment. Consequently, this
perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument highlight important aspects of remote
working. However, after careful consideration, I firmly believe that the
advantages of working from home slightly outweigh the disadvantages because it
offers greater flexibility and helps people maintain a better work-life
balance. Hence, it is essential that companies adopt hybrid work models that
combine office and home-based work for a balanced and effective outcome.
6. Some people think that studying abroad provides more benefits than
studying in one's home country. Do you agree or disagree?
Introduction
The issue of whether studying abroad offers more benefits than studying in
one's home country has become a matter of considerable debate in recent times.
While some people believe that overseas education provides better opportunities
and broader exposure, others argue that local institutions can offer
high-quality education at a lower cost. This essay will discuss both
perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why studying abroad can
be considered highly beneficial. Firstly, it allows students to experience
different cultures and lifestyles, which helps broaden their worldview. For
instance, learners living in countries like the UK or Australia often develop
independence and adaptability. Secondly, international universities often
provide advanced facilities, research opportunities, and globally recognized
degrees, which can improve career prospects. Therefore, it is understandable
why many people support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that studying
in one’s home country is equally valuable. They claim that local universities
are more affordable and allow students to stay close to their families,
reducing emotional and financial stress. Moreover, many home institutions now
offer quality education, skilled professors, and modern resources that prepare
students for successful careers. Additionally, students may find it easier to
understand the local job market and secure employment after graduation.
Consequently, this perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument present valid points. However, after
careful consideration, I firmly believe that studying abroad provides more
benefits because it enhances global exposure and improves career opportunities.
Hence, it is essential that students choose destinations and programs that
match their goals in order to achieve a balanced and rewarding educational experience.
7. Environmental pollution is increasing day by day. What are the main
causes, and what measures can be taken?
Introduction
The issue of rising environmental pollution has become a matter of considerable
debate in recent times. While some people believe that industrial activities
and urbanization are the main causes, others argue that poor waste management and
overuse of natural resources also contribute significantly. This essay will
discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why industrial growth and
urban expansion can be considered major causes of pollution. Firstly, factories
release harmful gases, chemicals, and toxic waste into the air and water, which
severely damages ecosystems. For example, industrial zones in many developing
countries experience high levels of air pollution that affect human health.
Secondly, rapid urbanization has increased the number of vehicles on the road,
leading to higher emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants. Therefore,
it is understandable why many people consider these factors responsible for
rising pollution levels.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing or additional viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who emphasize the role of poor waste
management argue that improper disposal practices also worsen pollution. They
claim that plastic waste, sewage, and household garbage are often dumped into
rivers and open areas, causing soil and water contamination. Moreover,
deforestation and overuse of natural resources disrupt ecological balance,
increasing the risk of environmental degradation. Consequently, this
perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument highlight important causes of
environmental pollution. However, after careful consideration, I firmly believe
that strict regulation of industries and improved waste management are
essential because they directly address the major sources of pollution. Hence,
it is vital that governments promote sustainable development, strengthen
environmental laws, and raise public awareness to achieve a cleaner and
healthier environment.
8. Advertising influences people to buy products they do not need. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
Introduction
The issue of whether advertising encourages people to buy unnecessary products
has become a matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people
believe that advertisements manipulate consumers’ choices, others argue that
they simply provide useful information about available products. This essay
will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why advertising can be
considered highly influential. Firstly, companies use persuasive techniques,
such as emotional appeals and celebrity endorsements, to convince people to
purchase items they may not actually need. For instance, many consumers buy the
latest smartphones even though their old devices work perfectly well. Secondly,
advertisements create a sense of desire and social pressure by suggesting that
owning certain brands leads to a better lifestyle. Therefore, it is
understandable why many people support the viewpoint that advertising drives
unnecessary consumption.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that
advertising also serves positive purposes. They claim that advertisements
inform consumers about product features, discounts, and new innovations, and
provide evidence such as educational ads for health products or eco-friendly
appliances. Moreover, advertising supports economic growth by helping
businesses reach wider audiences and by encouraging competition that can lead
to better quality and lower prices. Consequently, this perspective also holds
significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument present valid points. However, after
careful consideration, I firmly believe that advertising does influence people
to buy unnecessary products because it appeals to emotions and creates
artificial needs. Hence, it is essential that consumers develop critical
thinking skills and that governments regulate misleading advertisements for a
balanced and responsible marketplace.
9. Modern lifestyles are making people less healthy. What are the reasons,
and how can this problem be solved?
Introduction
The issue of modern lifestyles negatively affecting people’s health has become
a matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people believe that
sedentary habits and poor dietary choices are the main reasons, others argue
that stress and lack of exercise also play a significant role. This essay will
discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why sedentary behavior
and unhealthy eating can be considered major contributors to poor health.
Firstly, many people spend long hours sitting at desks or using electronic
devices, which reduces physical activity and leads to weight gain. For example,
office workers often develop obesity and related health problems due to
prolonged inactivity. Secondly, the increased consumption of fast food and
sugary drinks has caused nutritional deficiencies and chronic illnesses such as
diabetes and heart disease. Therefore, it is understandable why many people
view these factors as primary reasons for declining health.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing or additional viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who emphasize stress and lack of exercise
argue that mental health issues also affect physical well-being. They claim
that high-pressure jobs and busy schedules lead to sleep deprivation and
anxiety, and provide evidence such as studies linking stress to weakened
immunity and cardiovascular problems. Moreover, modern urban environments often
lack adequate spaces for exercise, making it difficult for people to maintain a
healthy lifestyle. Consequently, this perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument highlight important causes of poor
health in modern society. However, after careful consideration, I firmly
believe that adopting a balanced diet, regular exercise, and effective stress
management are essential because they address both physical and mental aspects
of health. Hence, it is vital that individuals and governments promote healthy
habits and create supportive environments for a healthier lifestyle.
10. Some people think that children should learn foreign languages from
primary school. Do you agree or disagree?
Introduction
The issue of whether children should start learning foreign languages from
primary school has become a matter of considerable debate in recent times.
While some people believe that early exposure to languages enhances
communication skills and cognitive development, others argue that it may place
unnecessary pressure on young learners. This essay will discuss both
perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why learning foreign
languages from a young age can be considered beneficial. Firstly, children have
a natural ability to absorb new languages more quickly, which helps them
achieve fluency and correct pronunciation. For example, students who learn
English or French in primary school often perform better in language exams
compared to those who start later. Secondly, early language learning improves
cognitive skills, such as memory, problem-solving, and multitasking, which contribute
to overall academic success. Therefore, it is understandable why many people
support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that
introducing foreign languages too early can be stressful for children. They
claim that young learners may struggle to balance multiple subjects, and
provide evidence such as students feeling overwhelmed by heavy homework and
language drills. Moreover, some educators argue that focusing too much on foreign
languages can limit time for learning fundamental subjects like mathematics and
science. Consequently, this perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument present valid points. However, after
careful consideration, I firmly believe that children should begin learning
foreign languages from primary school because it enhances communication skills
and boosts cognitive development. Hence, it is essential that schools design
age-appropriate language programs that make learning enjoyable and effective
for young students.
11. Economic development is the solution to poverty. Do you agree or
disagree?
Introduction
The issue of whether economic development is the solution to poverty has become
a matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people believe that
increasing national wealth and infrastructure can reduce poverty, others argue
that social policies and equitable distribution of resources are equally
important. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own
opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why economic development
can be considered a major solution to poverty. Firstly, a growing economy
creates more job opportunities, enabling people to earn a stable income and
improve their living standards. For example, countries that invest in
industries and infrastructure often see a significant reduction in unemployment
rates. Secondly, economic growth provides governments with higher revenue,
which can be used to fund education, healthcare, and welfare programs, directly
benefiting the poor. Therefore, it is understandable why many people support
this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that economic
development alone may not eliminate poverty. They claim that wealth often
remains concentrated in the hands of a few, and provide evidence such as
developing countries experiencing rapid GDP growth while a large proportion of
the population continues to live in poverty. Moreover, factors like corruption,
poor governance, and lack of social support systems can prevent economic growth
from reaching the disadvantaged. Consequently, this perspective also holds
significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument present valid points. However, after
careful consideration, I firmly believe that economic development is a key
solution to poverty because it generates employment and provides resources for
social welfare programs. Hence, it is essential that governments implement
policies ensuring that growth is inclusive and benefits all sections of
society.
12. Social media has changed the way people communicate. Discuss the
advantages and disadvantages.
Introduction
The issue of social media changing the way people communicate has become a
matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people believe that
it improves connectivity and information sharing, others argue that it
negatively affects personal relationships and communication skills. This essay
will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why social media can be
considered advantageous. Firstly, it allows people to stay connected with
family and friends, even across long distances. For example, platforms like
Facebook and WhatsApp enable instant messaging, video calls, and sharing of
life events. Secondly, social media provides quick access to news, educational
content, and professional networks, helping individuals stay informed and build
careers. Therefore, it is understandable why many people support this
viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose this idea argue that social
media can have negative effects on communication. They claim that excessive use
reduces face-to-face interactions and weakens personal relationships, and
provide evidence such as teenagers spending more time on phones than
interacting with family members. Moreover, social media often encourages
superficial communication, online arguments, and exposure to misinformation,
which can harm social and mental well-being. Consequently, this perspective
also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument highlight important aspects of social
media use. However, after careful consideration, I firmly believe that the
advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages because it enhances
connectivity and provides valuable information. Hence, it is essential that
people use social media responsibly and balance online communication with
real-life interactions for a healthier social environment.
13. Climate change is a serious global challenge. What are the impacts, and
how can governments respond?
Introduction
The issue of climate change being a serious global challenge has become a
matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people believe that
human activities are the main contributors, others argue that natural factors
also play a role. This essay will discuss the impacts of climate change and the
measures governments can take to address it before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several significant impacts of climate
change on the environment and human life. Firstly, rising global temperatures
lead to extreme weather events, such as floods, hurricanes, and heatwaves,
which threaten lives and property. For example, many coastal regions have
experienced devastating floods in recent years due to increased rainfall and
sea-level rise. Secondly, climate change disrupts ecosystems, causing loss of
biodiversity, affecting agriculture, and reducing food security. Therefore, it
is understandable why this issue is considered a major global concern.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing or additional viewpoint)
On the other hand, governments can play a crucial role in
mitigating climate change. They claim that implementing renewable energy
projects, such as solar and wind power, can reduce dependence on fossil fuels,
and provide evidence such as countries like Germany and Denmark investing
heavily in green energy. Moreover, governments can enforce strict environmental
regulations, promote reforestation, and raise public awareness about
sustainable practices. Consequently, this perspective also holds significant
value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, climate change has serious environmental and social impacts that
demand immediate action. However, after careful consideration, I firmly believe
that governments must take proactive measures, including promoting renewable
energy and enforcing environmental regulations, because these steps directly
reduce carbon emissions and protect ecosystems. Hence, it is essential that
global collaboration and national policies work together to tackle this urgent
challenge effectively.
14. Should governments spend more money on public transport instead of road
development?
Introduction
The issue of whether governments should prioritize spending on public transport
over road development has become a matter of considerable debate in recent
times. While some people believe that investing in public transport improves
efficiency and reduces pollution, others argue that road development is
necessary to accommodate growing traffic. This essay will discuss both
perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why investing in public
transport can be considered beneficial. Firstly, it reduces traffic congestion
by encouraging people to use buses, trains, and subways instead of private
vehicles. For example, cities with well-developed metro systems, like Tokyo and
London, experience smoother traffic flow and shorter commute times. Secondly,
public transport is more environmentally friendly, as it lowers carbon
emissions and reduces air pollution. Therefore, it is understandable why many
people support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who emphasize road development argue that
building new roads is essential to support increasing vehicle numbers. They
claim that expanding highways and repairing existing roads prevents traffic
jams and accidents, and provide evidence such as suburban areas where poor road
infrastructure slows down travel. Moreover, roads are necessary for emergency
services, logistics, and rural connectivity, which cannot be fully replaced by
public transport systems. Consequently, this perspective also holds significant
value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both sides of the argument present valid points. However, after
careful consideration, I firmly believe that governments should prioritize
spending on public transport because it reduces congestion, protects the
environment, and benefits a larger population. Hence, it is essential that
authorities develop efficient and affordable public transport systems while
maintaining essential road infrastructure for balanced urban development.
15. The gap between rich and poor is widening. What problems does this
create, and how can they be solved?
Introduction
The issue of the widening gap between the rich and the poor has become a matter
of considerable debate in recent times. While some people believe that this
inequality leads to social and economic problems, others argue that it can be
addressed through government policies and social reforms. This essay will
discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several problems caused by the growing
wealth disparity. Firstly, it increases social tensions and crime rates, as
disadvantaged people may resort to theft or illegal activities to meet their
needs. For example, in countries with extreme poverty, urban areas often
experience higher levels of crime and unrest. Secondly, economic inequality
limits access to education, healthcare, and job opportunities for the poor,
making it difficult for them to improve their living standards. Therefore, it
is understandable why many people view this issue as highly problematic.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing or additional viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who focus on solutions argue that
governments can reduce inequality through targeted policies. They claim that
progressive taxation, social welfare programs, and affordable education can
provide opportunities for disadvantaged groups, and provide evidence such as
countries that have successfully reduced poverty through subsidies and
scholarships. Moreover, promoting economic development and creating employment
opportunities can help bridge the gap between rich and poor. Consequently, this
perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the problems and solutions related to economic inequality
are important to consider. However, after careful consideration, I firmly
believe that implementing effective social policies and promoting inclusive
economic growth are essential because they provide opportunities for the
underprivileged and reduce social tensions. Hence, it is vital that governments
and society work together to achieve a fairer and more equitable world.
16. Some people think that arts subjects (music, drama, fine arts) are as
important as science subjects in schools. Do you agree?
Introduction
The issue of whether arts subjects are as important as science subjects in
schools has become a matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some
people believe that arts play a crucial role in students’ overall development,
others argue that science subjects are more important for career prospects.
This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why arts subjects can be
considered as important as science subjects. Firstly, they help develop
creativity, imagination, and emotional intelligence, which are essential skills
in many aspects of life. For example, students involved in music or drama often
learn teamwork, communication, and problem-solving skills. Secondly, arts
education provides opportunities for personal expression and stress relief,
contributing to students’ mental well-being. Therefore, it is understandable
why many people support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who emphasize science subjects argue that
they are critical for academic and professional success. They claim that
knowledge of subjects like physics, chemistry, and mathematics is essential for
careers in medicine, engineering, and technology, and provide evidence such as
the increasing demand for STEM professionals worldwide. Moreover, science
subjects often drive innovation and economic growth, which can have a broader
societal impact. Consequently, this perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both arts and science subjects offer unique benefits to
students. However, after careful consideration, I firmly believe that arts
subjects are equally important because they nurture creativity and emotional
development, complementing the analytical skills gained from science. Hence, it
is essential that schools provide a balanced curriculum that values both arts
and sciences for holistic education.
17. The use of robots in industries is increasing. Discuss the advantages
and disadvantages.
Introduction
The issue of increasing use of robots in industries has become a matter of
considerable debate in recent times. While some people believe that robots
improve efficiency and productivity, others argue that they can lead to job
losses and other challenges. This essay will discuss both perspectives before
presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why using robots in
industries can be considered advantageous. Firstly, robots increase efficiency
and precision, allowing tasks to be completed faster and with fewer errors. For
example, in automobile manufacturing, robots can assemble vehicles more
accurately than human workers. Secondly, robots can perform dangerous or
repetitive tasks, reducing the risk of accidents and improving workplace
safety. Therefore, it is understandable why many people support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose the extensive use of robots
argue that it can have negative social and economic consequences. They claim
that automation may lead to unemployment, especially among low-skilled workers,
and provide evidence such as factory closures or layoffs due to machines
replacing humans. Moreover, robots require high initial investment and
maintenance costs, which can be challenging for small businesses. Consequently,
this perspective also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the advantages and disadvantages of using robots in
industries are important to consider. However, after careful consideration, I
firmly believe that the benefits of robots outweigh the drawbacks because they
enhance productivity and improve workplace safety. Hence, it is essential that
industries adopt automation while also providing training and support for
workers to adapt to technological changes.
18. Parents should be responsible for teaching children how to be good
members of society. Do you agree or disagree?
Introduction
The issue of whether parents should be responsible for teaching children how to
be good members of society has become a matter of considerable debate in recent
times. While some people believe that moral and social education begins at
home, others argue that schools and communities also play a vital role. This
essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why parents can be
considered primarily responsible for teaching social values. Firstly, children
learn behaviors and attitudes from their immediate environment, and parents act
as the first role models. For example, children who observe honesty, kindness,
and respect at home are more likely to adopt these qualities. Secondly, parents
can provide consistent guidance and reinforcement in real-life situations,
helping children understand ethical and social responsibilities. Therefore, it
is understandable why many people support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who emphasize the role of schools and
communities argue that parents alone cannot ensure complete social education.
They claim that interaction with teachers, peers, and community members exposes
children to diverse perspectives and provide evidence such as school programs
promoting teamwork, civic responsibility, and environmental awareness.
Moreover, children may encounter challenges outside the home that require
additional guidance and mentoring. Consequently, this perspective also holds
significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both parents and external institutions play important roles in
shaping responsible citizens. However, after careful consideration, I firmly
believe that parents should take primary responsibility because they provide
early guidance and continuous reinforcement of social values. Hence, it is
essential that parents actively teach ethics, respect, and civic responsibility
while collaborating with schools to ensure holistic development.
19. University education should be free for everyone. Do you agree or
disagree?
Introduction
The issue of whether university education should be free for everyone has
become a matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people
believe that free higher education promotes equality and access to
opportunities, others argue that it may lead to financial strain on governments
and affect quality. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting
my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why making university education
free can be considered beneficial. Firstly, it ensures equal access to
education, allowing talented students from low-income families to pursue higher
studies without financial barriers. For example, countries that provide free
tertiary education often see higher enrollment rates and improved social
mobility. Secondly, free education encourages a more educated workforce, which
can drive innovation, economic growth, and social development. Therefore, it is
understandable why many people support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who oppose free university education
argue that it places a heavy financial burden on governments. They claim that
funding free education for all citizens may lead to higher taxes and reduced
investment in other essential services, and provide evidence such as countries
struggling to maintain quality due to budget constraints. Moreover, free
education may reduce students’ motivation to value their studies if they do not
contribute financially. Consequently, this perspective also holds significant
value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the advantages and disadvantages of free university
education are important to consider. However, after careful consideration, I
firmly believe that university education should be made free because it
promotes equality and creates a skilled workforce. Hence, it is essential that
governments find sustainable ways to fund higher education while maintaining
quality and accessibility for all.
20. Tourism brings both benefits and problems to a country. Discuss both
views and give your own opinion.
Introduction
The issue of tourism bringing both benefits and problems to a country has
become a matter of considerable debate in recent times. While some people
believe that tourism boosts the economy and cultural exchange, others argue
that it can lead to environmental degradation and social issues. This essay
will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 – (First viewpoint)
To begin with, there are several reasons why tourism can be
considered beneficial. Firstly, it generates significant revenue and creates
employment opportunities in sectors such as hotels, transport, and local
businesses. For example, countries like Thailand and France rely heavily on
tourism as a major source of income. Secondly, tourism promotes cultural
exchange and global understanding by exposing both visitors and locals to
different traditions, cuisines, and lifestyles. Therefore, it is understandable
why many people support this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 – (Opposing viewpoint)
On the other hand, those who emphasize the negative effects of
tourism argue that it can harm the environment and local communities. They
claim that overcrowding, pollution, and unplanned construction damage natural
sites, and provide evidence such as littering and destruction of fragile ecosystems
in popular tourist destinations. Moreover, tourism may lead to cultural commoditization
and rising living costs for local residents. Consequently, this perspective
also holds significant value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the advantages and disadvantages of tourism are important
to consider. However, after careful consideration, I firmly believe that the
benefits outweigh the drawbacks because tourism boosts the economy and fosters
cultural understanding. Hence, it is essential that governments implement
sustainable tourism practices and regulations to minimize environmental and
social problems while maximizing benefits.
No comments:
Post a Comment