1st Story
The Selfish Giant
Oscar Wilde
About
the Writer
Oscar Wilde (1854–1900) was an Irish poet, playwright, and author,
known for his wit, flamboyant style, and exploration of social norms. Wilde's
famous works include The Picture of Dorian Gray and The
Importance of Being Earnest. The Selfish Giant is part of his 1888 collection The Happy
Prince and Other Tales, written for his children but layered with
deep moral and philosophical messages.
Setting
- Location: The story is set in the Giant’s beautiful garden, filled
with lush trees, flowers, and singing birds.
- Time: The setting is timeless, resembling a fairy-tale landscape
that reflects the changing seasons.
Plot
Summary
The Giant’s garden is a paradise for local children who sneak in
to play while he is away. Upon his return, the Giant, angry and possessive,
builds a high wall to keep them out. Without the children’s presence, the
garden falls into perpetual winter. One day, the Giant discovers that the
children have found a way back, and spring returns with them. He spots a small
boy struggling to climb a tree, helps him, and his heart softens. The Giant
tears down the wall, welcoming the children forever.
Years later, the Giant sees the same small boy (symbolic of
Christ) with wounds on his hands and feet. The boy invites him to his
garden—Paradise—where the Giant dies peacefully.
Main
Characters
- The Giant – Initially selfish and cold-hearted, he transforms into a
kind, loving figure.
- The Little Boy – A Christ-like figure who teaches the Giant compassion and
redemption.
- The Children – Represent innocence, joy, and the transformative power of
love.
Themes
- Selfishness and Redemption – The Giant's journey reflects how selfishness isolates but
can be redeemed through kindness.
- Childhood and Innocence – The children bring life and beauty, symbolizing purity and
joy.
- Christian Symbolism – The little boy mirrors Christ, emphasizing love, sacrifice,
and spiritual rebirth.
- Seasons as Metaphors – The changing seasons reflect the Giant’s emotional and
moral transformation.
Summary
The Selfish Giant by Oscar Wilde tells the story of a cold-hearted Giant who owns a
beautiful garden. While he is away, children from the village sneak in to play
there, filling it with laughter and joy. However, upon his return, the Giant
angrily chases the children away and builds a tall wall to keep them out. He
places a sign that warns trespassers will be punished. The garden, once vibrant
and full of life, falls into perpetual winter, as spring refuses to come. The
Giant cannot understand why his garden remains cold and lifeless while the rest
of the land blossoms.
One morning, the Giant hears the sound of birds singing and is
astonished to see that spring has returned. He discovers that the children have
found a way back through a hole in the wall. In one corner of the garden,
winter still lingers where a small boy struggles to climb a tree. Moved by
compassion, the Giant helps the boy and realizes the beauty of kindness. As a
result, the garden blooms once more. The Giant, now transformed, tears down the
wall and welcomes the children to play in his garden forever.
The Giant grows old and cherishes his time with the children.
However, he never sees the small boy he helped again. One winter morning, the
Giant finds the boy standing beneath a tree, with wounds on his hands and feet.
The Giant is enraged, asking who hurt the boy, but the child reassures him that
these are wounds of love. The boy invites the Giant to his garden, which he
explains is Paradise.
Later that day, the children find the Giant dead beneath the tree,
covered in white blossoms. His heart is at peace, and his body rests as if in
eternal spring. Wilde’s story concludes with the message that love, compassion,
and selflessness lead to redemption and spiritual fulfillment.
Alternate summary
"The Selfish Giant" is a short story
by Oscar Wilde, first published in 1888 as part of his collection The
Happy Prince and Other Tales. Here’s a summary:
The story revolves around a Giant who owns a
beautiful garden. Children love playing in the garden, especially when the
Giant is away. However, the Giant, being selfish, builds a high wall around his
garden to keep the children out, posting a notice that trespassers will be
prosecuted.
As a result, Spring stops coming to the
garden, and it remains in perpetual Winter. The garden becomes bleak and cold,
with no flowers blooming and no birds singing. The Giant does not understand
why his garden is so desolate while the rest of the world enjoys the beauty of
Spring.
One day, the children find a way back into the
garden through a hole in the wall. As they play, the garden starts to bloom
again, bringing back the beauty of Spring. The Giant, seeing this, realizes how
selfish he has been and his heart melts. He knocks down the wall and welcomes
the children back, enjoying their laughter and the return of nature’s beauty to
his garden.
However, one small boy, who is different from
the others, touches the Giant deeply. This boy, whom the Giant once saw
struggling to climb a tree, later reappears with wounds on his hands and feet.
The boy reveals that these are the wounds of love and tells the Giant that he
has been invited to his garden, which is paradise. The Giant, realizing who the
boy really is, is filled with peace.
Years later, the Giant is found dead in the
garden, covered in blossoms, signifying that he has gone to paradise with the
boy, who is implied to be a Christ-like figure. The story ends with the notion that
the Giant's soul has found rest in eternal peace and beauty.
Long Questions
1) Discuss the transformation of the Giant's
character throughout the story. What events lead to this change?
The Giant starts as a selfish character who is
unwilling to share his garden with the children. His realization of the joy and
beauty the children bring to the garden, and the arrival of Spring with them,
leads him to understand the value of generosity and love. His encounter with
the small boy, who he later realizes has wounds resembling those of Christ,
deeply touches him, ultimately leading to his complete transformation into a
kind and loving figure.
2.) Analyze the symbolic significance of the
garden in "The Selfish Giant." What does it represent in the story?
The garden symbolizes the Giant's heart and
soul. When he is selfish, the garden becomes cold and barren, mirroring his
emotional state. When he opens his heart to the children, the garden
flourishes, symbolizing the warmth and beauty that generosity and kindness
bring to life. The changing seasons in the garden also reflect the themes of
redemption and the cycle of life and renewal.
3.) What is the significance of the small boy
with wounds on his hands and feet in the story? How does his presence influence
the Giant?
The small boy with wounds on his hands and
feet symbolizes a Christ-like figure, representing love, sacrifice, and
redemption. His presence and the wounds, which evoke the crucifixion, deeply
affect the Giant, prompting him to realize the consequences of his selfishness.
This encounter leads the Giant to a profound understanding of love and
generosity, ultimately bringing him peace and redemption. The boy's invitation
to the Giant to join him in his garden (paradise) signifies the Giant's spiritual
awakening and redemption.
Reference
beyond text
a. What is the main theme
of the story?
The main theme of this
story is selfishness and love. It is the story of transformation of selfish
giant into selfless giant. At the beginning of the story, the giant was very
selfish and wicked towards the children and he closes the gate of beautiful
garden for them. But later he realizes his mistake when the children stop
coming to the garden and the garden never experiences the spring season until
and unless he allows them to play in his garden. At this point he realizes the
meaning of love and sharing. This story is very much relatable to the nature of
human beings. We hardly share our belongings to anyone if somebody is needy and
we are selfish too. This story teaches us to share love and compassion to get
love in return.
b. Does God punish those who are cruel to children and very selfish?
Yes, God punishes those
who are cruel to children and very selfish. As in the story, Giant has really
been so cruel to the children and selfish and he didn’t let them play on the
garden because of which spring never came in his garden. In the absence of
children birds also did not sing. Once, a flower bloomed out of the grass but
after seeing the notice board, it also went back to sleep. Then came the North
Wind and the hailstorm. Due to the giant’s selfishness, autumn’s golden fruits
also did not come to his garden. In this way god punishes to those who are
cruel to children and very selfish.
When the little child
smiled at the Giant, and said to him, "You let me play once in your
garden, today you shall come with me to my garden, which is Paradise,"
shortly afterwards, the happy giant dies. What is the coincidence of this
event? Describe it in relation to this fairy story.
The
coincidence of this event once, the giant let the little child play in his
garden and make him happy and today the same child wants to take him to his
garden paradise to make him happy in return, which means the final time of the
gaint has come and the little child is a messenger/ fairy who wants him to the
heaven because of his noble works.
Short questions & answers
1. The story makes use of
personification as one of the main figures of speech. Cite three examples of
personification from the story. What is the significance of the seasons
personified in the story?
The
practice of representing the objects, qualities etc. as the human beings in art
and literature is called personification. Three examples of personification
from the story are the beautiful little flowers that slips back into the garden
after seeing the notice board, the snow and the frost who says that the spring
has forgotten this garden.
The
story has the significance of the seasons personified. At the beginning, the
seasons bless the garden with pleasant weather until the Giant sends the
children away from his garden. Because of the Giant’s unkindness to the
children, the spring season leaves the garden. The seasons disfavor indicates
that the Giant’s selfishness goes against the natural order and thus deserves
punishment. Thus the significance of the seasons personification is to show
that if someone does bad then he/she will deserve the bad.
2. This story can be read as a fairy story, where the children, the seasons,
the tree, the corner of the garden, the snow, the wind and the frost are all
used as symbolism. Interpret those symbols.
The
story ‘The Selfish Giant’ is a fairy tale. Here, the children symbolize
innocence, love, compassion and blessings. Likewise the seasons represent life
and death. The tree symbolizes patience and hope. The corner of the garden
depicts the paradise. Finally the snow, the wind and the frost symbolize pain,
suffering and discomfort.
3. Which figure of speech
is used for ‘winter, frost, snow, north wind, hail and little child’? Who is
the little child compared to?
As a
fairy tale, the story is full of figures of speech. The figure of speech is
used for ‘winter, frost, snow, north wind, hail and little child’ is
personification. The little child is compared to the God Almighty (Paradise).
2nd Story
The Oval Portrait
Edgar
Allan Poe
"The Oval Portrait" by Edgar
Allan Poe is a short story first published in 1842. It blends elements of
Gothic fiction with Poe's signature exploration of beauty, art, and death.
Setting
The story is set in a dark, abandoned chateau in the Apennine
Mountains of Italy. The gloomy, mysterious atmosphere is crucial to the Gothic
tone. The action primarily takes place within a richly decorated chamber where
the narrator, injured and seeking refuge, discovers an intriguing painting.
Plot
The plot unfolds through a frame narrative:
- The unnamed narrator and his servant
enter the chateau to escape the cold night. The narrator, wounded and
weak, rests in one of the rooms.
- While admiring the luxurious decorations,
he notices an oval portrait of a young woman, which captivates him with
its lifelike quality.
- Curious, he reads a book found in the
room that details the history of the paintings. One entry recounts the
tragic story behind the oval portrait.
- The woman in the painting was the wife of
a passionate artist. Obsessed with capturing her beauty, the artist
painted her relentlessly. As he worked, the woman’s health deteriorated,
and she died just as he completed the portrait.
- The story ends with the chilling
realization that the artist’s obsession with his work led to the loss of
his wife’s life.
Main
Characters
- The Narrator – An injured man who discovers the portrait and unravels its
tragic backstory.
- The Artist – A devoted painter whose obsession with his art blinds him
to his wife's suffering.
- The Artist’s Wife – A beautiful woman whose life fades as she poses for the
portrait, symbolizing the cost of artistic obsession.
- Pedro – The narrator’s servant, who tends to him during his stay
in the chateau.
Themes
- The Price of Art and Obsession – The story explores how artistic passion can become
destructive, even to the point of sacrificing a loved one.
- Death and Beauty – Poe reflects on the idea that immortalizing beauty in art
often coincides with the physical decline or death of the subject.
- The Supernatural and Gothic Atmosphere – The eerie, isolated setting and the mysterious portrait
contribute to the sense of dread and supernatural undercurrents.
- Illusion vs. Reality – The lifelike quality of the portrait blurs the line
between life and art, questioning the nature of representation and
reality.
Summary
"The Oval Portrait" by Edgar
Allan Poe is a brief yet haunting tale that explores the intersection of art,
beauty, and mortality. The story begins with an unnamed narrator, who, injured
and exhausted, seeks shelter in an abandoned chateau in the Apennine Mountains.
Accompanied by his servant Pedro, he rests in a dimly lit chamber filled with
luxurious decorations and numerous paintings. As the narrator lies on the bed,
his eyes are drawn to an oval portrait of a young woman, which strikes him with
its almost supernatural lifelike quality.
Curious about the painting, the narrator finds a book in the room
that describes the history of the various artworks displayed. He begins reading
by candlelight and soon discovers the tragic back story of the oval portrait.
The woman in the painting was the wife of a passionate and obsessive artist.
Though she loved her husband, she resented the attention he lavished on his art
rather than on her. When he decided to paint her, she reluctantly agreed,
despite feeling that the long hours spent posing drained her spirit.
As the artist became increasingly engrossed in capturing her
likeness, he failed to notice her gradual decline. His obsession with
perfecting the painting grew to the point where he seemed unaware of the real
woman sitting before him. With each brushstroke, his wife’s vitality faded, and
by the time he finished the portrait, she had died. The story concludes with
the chilling realization that the artist’s success in immortalizing her beauty
coincided with the loss of her life, a grim commentary on the destructive power
of artistic obsession.
Poe’s tale masterfully weaves Gothic elements with philosophical
reflections on the nature of art and sacrifice. The dark, mysterious setting
enhances the eerie mood, while the oval portrait serves as a symbol of the
delicate balance between life and art. Through this brief yet powerful
narrative, Poe explores the idea that capturing beauty can often come at a
terrible cost, leaving readers to ponder the fine line between devotion and
destruction.
Understanding the text
Answer these questions.
a. Where did the narrator and his servant make forcible entrance?
The narrator and his servant, Pedro, made a forcible entrance into an abandoned chateau in the Apennine Mountains. The narrator, suffering from severe injuries and exhaustion, needed a place to rest for the night. As they explored the dark and desolate building, they settled in one of the smaller, richly decorated rooms that seemed less damp and more comfortable than the others. This chamber, adorned with tapestries, armorial trophies, and paintings, became the setting for the narrator’s discovery of the mysterious oval portrait that captivated his attention and led to the unfolding of the tragic tale.
b. Which special picture did the narrator notice in the room?
The
narrator noticed a striking oval portrait of a young woman in the room. The
painting’s extraordinary lifelike quality immediately captivated him, making it
stand out among the other decorations and artworks. The portrait's vivid
realism left the narrator in awe, prompting him to investigate its story
further by reading a book he found in the chamber that detailed the histories
of the paintings. This portrait ultimately became the focal point of the
narrative, revealing a tragic tale of love, obsession, and sacrifice.
c. Describe the portrait that the narrator saw in the room.
The
portrait that the narrator saw was an oval-shaped painting of a young woman,
remarkable for its striking realism and beauty. The woman depicted appeared to
be in the early bloom of youth, full of grace and vitality. Her expression was
serene yet tinged with melancholy, and the detail was so vivid that the
narrator was momentarily startled, feeling as though the subject was alive. The
light from the candelabrum illuminated the portrait, enhancing its lifelike
quality and creating an almost supernatural presence. The delicate artistry and
emotional depth of the painting left a profound impression on the narrator,
drawing him deeper into the mysterious and tragic story behind it.
d. What is the relationship between the portrait painter and its
subject?
The
portrait painter and the subject of the painting had a deeply personal
relationship – they were husband and wife. The artist, driven by his passion
for his work, became obsessed with capturing his wife's beauty on canvas.
Although the wife loved her husband, she felt neglected as his devotion to his
art overshadowed his attention to her. Despite her reluctance, she agreed to
pose for the portrait, enduring long sessions that gradually drained her
health. Tragically, the artist became so engrossed in perfecting the painting
that he failed to notice her physical decline. By the time he completed the
portrait, his wife had died, symbolizing the destructive power of artistic obsession
and the personal sacrifices made in the pursuit of art.
Reference to the context
a. What is the central theme of the story? Who is the woman depicted in
the oval portrait?
The central theme of the story “The
Oval Portrait” presents the confusing relationship between art and life. This
story has shown the destructive power or the addiction of art and love. Both
art and love can lead anyone towards perfection whereas they can bring
destructive results in anyone’s life too. Although the artist of this story has
become successful through his artistic work but his wife became a victim. She
lost her husband so extremely that she doesn’t reveal her pains and sufferings
and lose her life. This story also suggests that a women’s beauty collapsed her
to death.
The woman depicted in the oval
portrait is the wife of a passionate painter who has painted this oval portrait.
b. "The Oval Portrait" is a short horror story by Edgar Allan
Poe involving the disturbing circumstances surrounding a portrait in a chateau.
Elaborate.
This short story has presented a
terrible and gloomy setting of a barren Chateau in one of the mountains range
(Apennines) of central Italy. The Chateau in this story is completely deserted
and very old fashioned. The Chateau itself drowned in darkness in a desolated
place. The apartments inside Chateau were so unmanaged and dirty though it was
richly decorated previously. The walls were full of tapestries and panting
creating a gloomy atmosphere. The life-like portrait has been placed in one of
the dark corners. The surrounding of the lifelike portrait is so disturbing due
to the unmanaged condition everywhere. Thus it looked quite like a horror story.
c. "The Oval Portrait" suggests that the woman’s beauty
condemns her to death. Discuss.
In "The Oval Portrait," Edgar Allan Poe explores the
idea that the woman’s beauty ultimately leads to her death, illustrating how
the artist’s obsession with preserving her loveliness consumes her life. The
woman, described as full of youth and grace, becomes the subject of her
husband's artistic ambition. While she embodies life and vitality, the act of
immortalizing her on canvas gradually drains her of these qualities. Her
beauty, which initially captivates the artist, becomes a curse as he
prioritizes perfecting the painting over recognizing her physical and emotional
needs. The more lifelike the portrait becomes, the closer she comes to death,
suggesting that the effort to preserve beauty paradoxically destroys it.
Poe uses the tragic outcome to highlight the dangerous
consequences of artistic obsession and the objectification of women. The woman,
reduced to a passive muse, loses her identity as a living person and becomes a
mere image, forever frozen in the portrait. Her death symbolizes the ultimate
price paid for the artist’s relentless pursuit of his craft. By portraying
beauty as something that leads to destruction, Poe critiques the idea that art
can truly capture life without exacting a heavy toll. The story serves as a
powerful reminder that unchecked passion, even for art, can have fatal
consequences for those who are caught in its path.
d. Discuss the story as a frame narrative (a story within a story).
"The Oval Portrait" is a classic
example of a frame narrative, where one story exists within the context of
another. The outer frame involves the unnamed narrator, who, after seeking
refuge in an abandoned chateau, becomes engrossed in the room’s art and
decorations. This part of the narrative sets the Gothic tone, introducing the
dark, mysterious atmosphere that foreshadows the eerie tale to come. The
narrator’s discovery of the oval portrait and his subsequent reading of the
accompanying book shifts the focus to the inner story—the tragic account of the
artist and his wife.
The inner story, which recounts the life and death of the woman in
the portrait, is revealed through the narrator’s reading. This layered
storytelling technique enhances the sense of mystery and detachment, as the
events of the past are filtered through multiple perspectives. The frame
structure creates a reflective quality, allowing readers to experience the same
sense of gradual revelation and horror as the narrator. By employing this
technique, Poe emphasizes the timeless nature of the tragedy, blurring the
boundaries between art, life, and death. The frame narrative ultimately
reinforces the central theme of obsession, drawing attention to the enduring
power of art to preserve beauty at a deadly cost.
e. The story is told in a descriptive style, with plenty of imagery and
symbolism. Which images and symbols do you find in the story?
"The Oval Portrait" by Edgar Allan Poe is rich in
imagery and symbolism, which enhance the story’s haunting atmosphere and reinforce
its central themes
Frame
·
It symbolizes
the physical character of the young girl.
·
It is trying to
capture all the physical beauty of a young girl in the frame only.
Image of young girl
·
It symbolizes the beauty
of artist’s wife that he tried to depict through the portrait.
f. What does the expression “She was dead!” mean?
The expression “She was dead!” in "The Oval Portrait" carries
profound significance, revealing the tragic irony at the heart of the story.
When the narrator, after reading the backstory of the painting, realizes that
the woman in the portrait has died, it is a shocking revelation that the
artist's obsessive pursuit of capturing her beauty led to her literal death.
The exclamation underscores the chilling irony that the artist succeeded in
immortalizing her beauty on canvas, but in doing so, he drained her life away.
The moment of realization highlights the destructive cost of artistic obsession:
while the woman’s beauty is preserved forever in the portrait, her physical
existence has been sacrificed for it.
This statement also conveys the finality of her death, marking the
culmination of the tragic narrative. It serves as a haunting reminder that
beauty, when idolized and pursued relentlessly, can come at the expense of life
itself. The stark simplicity of the phrase encapsulates the horrific truth of
the story her life was lost in the very act of capturing her beauty, a fatal
consequence of the artist’s single-minded devotion to his work.
Reference beyond the text
a. Do you think there is life in art?
The question of whether there is life in art is deeply
philosophical and has been explored by many artists, writers, and thinkers
throughout history. In "The
Oval Portrait," Edgar Allan Poe seems to suggest that art has the potential to
capture the essence or spirit of life, but at a cost. In the story, the
portrait of the woman is described as so lifelike that it seems almost to
breathe, which evokes the idea that art can preserve or even encapsulate a
moment of life. However, the tragedy lies in the fact that the woman’s life is
drained away as she sits for the portrait, and she is physically dead by the
time the painting is completed, even though her beauty lives on in the image.
This duality reflects a complex truth: while art can indeed evoke
emotions, memories, and sensations that feel alive, it is also inherently a
representation, a static image or form that cannot fully replicate the vitality
of actual life. Art, in this sense, captures a part of life—its beauty, pain,
or intensity—but it also distances itself from the immediacy of lived
experience. The act of creating art can preserve something of a person or
moment, yet it cannot bring back or replicate the full essence of life itself.
So, yes, art can hold a certain "life" in the sense that
it evokes strong feelings, transcends time, and immortalizes aspects of human
experience, but it also exists as a form of remembrance, often highlighting the
distance between life and the frozen image it creates. The tension between life
and art, as seen in Poe’s story, ultimately reveals that while art can capture
life, it can never fully replace or resurrect it.
b. As a thing of art nothing could be more admirable than the painting
itself. Explain.
I totally agree with the above
statement. Painting is really a very admirable form of art. The painters really
work hard and spend much time to create quality paintings with meanings. A
picture can paint a thousand words. The painting itself speaks in its literal
manner. Here in this story, the oval portrait is one of the finest examples
which has surprised the narrator. He feels completely puzzled to see that
painting and start describing about it. True arts baffles all formulas and it’s
true that as a thing of art nothing could be more admirable than the painting
itself.
c. A more intense
look at the painting reveals the illusion. Have you noticed any such painting?
Yes, I have noticed such
painting which reveals the illusion. A painting can’t be judged at a single
look. An artist spends days to make an art. Every objects in an art possess
special meaning. The painting becomes more meaningful when it is watched by the
viewer who is passionate about paintings. But, for those viewers like me who
don’t have an idea about paintings find illusion all the time. In my case, I
watched a typical painting in a museum near my house for a long time but I
didn’t get meanings about it.
3rd
Story
God Sees the Truth but Waits
Leo Tolstoy
"God
Sees the Truth, But Waits" is a short story written by Russian author Leo Tolstoy. The story
was first published in 1872 and is one of Tolstoy’s most widely-read and
admired works. It is a moral tale about the themes of faith, justice,
forgiveness, and the power of patience.
Setting
The story is set in Russia, primarily within the confines of a
prison, where the central character, Aksionov, is held after being wrongfully
convicted of murder. The setting also includes a few scenes outside the prison,
including Aksionov's home and his journey to the prison. The bleak and
oppressive atmosphere of the prison symbolizes the inner torment of the
characters and their struggles with faith and justice.
Plot
The story revolves around Aksionov, a peaceful,
kind-hearted merchant from a small town, who is wrongfully accused of murder.
He is arrested and sent to prison for a crime he did not commit, losing his
family, his wealth, and his reputation. Throughout his years in prison, he
lives a life of quiet suffering and spiritual growth, praying for justice but
never seeking revenge. His life takes an unexpected turn when he meets Makar
Devushkin, a fellow prisoner who reveals that he was the real murderer.
Aksionov is initially torn between his desire for revenge and his newfound
sense of spiritual clarity. However, after much internal struggle and
reflection, he decides to forgive Makar, which ultimately leads to his release
and reconciliation with God. The story ends with Aksionov finding peace and
understanding that God’s justice is always right, even when it takes time.
Characters
- Aksionov – The protagonist, a noble and patient man who is wrongly
imprisoned for a crime he did not commit. Over time, he grows spiritually,
accepting the hardships of his life and finding peace through faith.
- Makar Devushkin – The real murderer, a fellow prisoner who eventually
confesses to the crime. His revelation is the turning point in Aksionov’s
spiritual journey.
- Aksionov’s wife – Though she is mentioned briefly, she is an important
character in Aksionov’s life, as her belief in his innocence causes her to
suffer greatly during his years of imprisonment.
- Other prisoners – Several other minor characters appear throughout the
story, particularly within the prison setting, contributing to Aksionov’s
development.
Themes
- Faith and Redemption – One of the central themes is the power of faith. Despite
his wrongful imprisonment, Aksionov’s unwavering faith helps him endure
and grow spiritually, showing the redemptive power of trust in God’s plan.
- Justice and Patience – The story reflects on the theme of justice, with the
understanding that true justice may not always be immediate but is in
God’s hands. Aksionov learns to wait for God’s timing and accept that
divine justice is perfect.
- Forgiveness – Aksionov’s decision to forgive Makar is a key moral
lesson. Despite the betrayal and suffering he has endured, Aksionov
chooses forgiveness, which ultimately leads to his freedom and peace.
- The Nature of Suffering – The story explores how suffering, although painful, can be
transformative. Through his years in prison, Aksionov becomes a wiser,
more compassionate person who learns the value of spiritual growth over
material success.
Summary
"God Sees the Truth, But Waits" is a story
about a man named Aksionov, a merchant
who lives a peaceful life with his wife and children in Russia. One day, while
traveling to a fair, Aksionov is accused of murder after a fellow merchant is
found dead, and Aksionov’s knife is discovered at the crime scene. Despite his
protests of innocence, he is convicted and sent to a remote Siberian prison.
His life is completely shattered as he loses his family, wealth, and
reputation, all while maintaining his innocence.
Over the years, Aksionov adapts to life in prison. He becomes
known for his good character and spirituality, never seeking revenge or
harboring hatred, even though he suffers greatly. He spends his days working,
praying, and reflecting, growing increasingly devoted to God. Aksionov’s heart
remains pure, and he becomes a respected and patient figure among the other
prisoners, though he still yearns for justice and dreams of one day being
released.
The story takes a pivotal turn when a new prisoner, Makar
Devushkin, arrives at the prison. Makar is a man with a mysterious past,
and over time, Aksionov comes to suspect that he may know something about the
murder he was wrongfully accused of. After many years, Makar finally confesses
that he was the one who committed the crime and framed Aksionov. However,
Aksionov, having undergone a profound spiritual transformation, struggles with
the temptation for vengeance but ultimately decides to forgive Makar. This act
of forgiveness symbolizes Aksionov’s deep faith in God’s will and his release
from the burden of anger and resentment.
In the end, Aksionov’s decision to forgive Makar leads to a
peaceful resolution. Makar, feeling guilty for causing Aksionov’s suffering,
dies shortly after confessing. Aksionov, having come to terms with his wrongful
imprisonment and the pain he endured, finds peace in knowing that God’s justice
is beyond human understanding and that divine truth always prevails. The story
concludes with Aksionov’s acceptance of his fate, recognizing that true freedom
comes not from being released from prison, but from spiritual clarity and
forgiveness.
Understanding the text
a. What bad habits did Aksionov have before his marriage?
Before his marriage, Aksionov had several bad habits that were
quite common among young men of his time. He was known to be a heavy drinker,
often indulging in alcohol to excess. This excessive drinking led to impulsive
behavior, and on occasion, he would act rashly and irresponsibly. He was also
somewhat hot-tempered, quick to anger, and prone to making hasty decisions
without much thought. These traits caused tension in his life and
relationships, including with his wife, who initially had to deal with his
unpredictable behavior. However, after his marriage, Aksionov reformed his ways
and became more thoughtful, responsible, and devout, focusing on his work and
family rather than his previous vices. His transformation into a patient,
spiritual man became one of the central elements of his character as the story
progressed.
b. What can be the meaning of his wife’s dream?
In "God Sees the Truth, But Waits," Aksionov’s
wife’s dream is a prophetic vision that foreshadows the suffering and hardship
that her husband will soon face. In the dream, she sees Aksionov with white
hair and a pale face, symbols of distress and aging, which suggests that he
will undergo a transformative experience—one that will age him and take a
physical and emotional toll. The dream reflects her deep, intuitive fear about
the journey he is about to embark on and hints at the inevitable suffering of
their future. It underscores the themes of fate and the unpredictability of
life, highlighting how certain events, such as Aksionov’s wrongful
imprisonment, are beyond their control, despite the love and concern they
share. The dream acts as a tragic premonition, signaling the trials to come and
marking the beginning of Aksionov’s long and difficult spiritual journey.
c. Why did Aksionov think of killing himself?
Aksionov thought of killing himself during the early years of his
imprisonment because of the overwhelming despair and injustice he felt. He was
wrongfully accused of murder and had been separated from his family, wealth,
and life as he knew it. The agony of being wrongly imprisoned, coupled with the
loss of everything dear to him, led Aksionov to a moment of deep hopelessness.
He felt as though there was no end to his suffering, and in that dark moment,
the thought of suicide seemed like a way to escape the torment of his wrongful
conviction and his isolation from the world.
However, Aksionov did not act on this impulse. Instead, after
reflecting on his faith and the idea of God's will, he ultimately decided to
endure his suffering rather than give in to despair. This decision marks a
pivotal moment in his spiritual growth, as he shifts from a man full of
bitterness and anger to one who accepts his fate with patience and trust in
God’s plan. His ability to resist the temptation of suicide and endure his
suffering shows the beginning of his transformation into a more spiritually
enlightened and forgiving person.
d. Why did Makar disclose that he had killed the merchant?
Makar disclosed that he had killed the merchant because he felt
overwhelmed by guilt and remorse after years of living with the secret. When
Makar first arrived at the prison, Aksionov was suspicious of him, but he did
not know for sure that Makar was the true murderer. Over time, Makar became
aware of Aksionov’s deep spiritual transformation and the peaceful, forgiving
attitude that had developed within him despite the injustice he had suffered.
This inner peace and integrity, along with the passage of time, weighed heavily
on Makar’s conscience.
Makar’s guilt eventually reached a breaking point, and he could no
longer live with the burden of knowing that he had wronged an innocent man. In
a moment of confession, Makar admitted to Aksionov that he was the one who had
committed the murder for which Aksionov had been wrongly imprisoned. He
revealed the truth, perhaps in a desire to relieve himself of the guilt and to
seek some form of redemption, knowing that Aksionov had been an unjustly
sentenced man who had endured so much. Makar’s disclosure marked a significant
moment of moral reckoning for him, but also highlighted Aksionov’s deep sense
of forgiveness and spiritual growth, which ultimately led him to let go of
anger and resentment, finding peace in the face of this revelation.
e.
Why doesn’t Aksionov wish to return to his family at the end of the story?
At the end of the story, Aksionov does not wish to return to his
family because he has undergone a profound spiritual transformation during his
years of imprisonment. Throughout his time in the Siberian prison, Aksionov has
grown increasingly devoted to God, accepting his wrongful conviction and
finding peace through patience, forgiveness, and prayer. When he finally learns
the truth about his innocence and the identity of the real murderer, Makar,
Aksionov no longer feels the same attachment to his former life. His physical
appearance has changed, and the life he once knew—his family, his wealth, and
his status—seems distant and irrelevant compared to his inner peace and
spiritual clarity.
Additionally, Aksionov recognizes that his family has likely moved
on without him. His wife may have passed away, and his children have grown up
in his absence. He no longer desires to return to a life that is rooted in
worldly attachments and material concerns. His focus has shifted entirely to
his relationship with God and the fulfillment he finds in living a life of
humility and spiritual understanding. Thus, Aksionov’s decision to remain in
the prison rather than return to his family symbolizes his acceptance of God's
will and the realization that true freedom comes not from physical release, but
from inner peace and faith.
Reference to the context
b. Describe Aksionov’s character.
Aksionov, the protagonist of "God
Sees the Truth, But Waits," is a complex character who undergoes significant transformation
throughout the story. At the start, Aksionov is depicted as a young, impulsive
man with a tendency to indulge in alcohol and a quick temper. He is also
somewhat selfish and carefree, focused on enjoying life and pursuing his
business. However, his character begins to evolve after his wrongful
imprisonment for a murder he did not commit.
As he spends years in the harsh Siberian prison, Aksionov
undergoes a profound spiritual transformation. He becomes increasingly patient,
humble, and devout, finding solace in prayer and faith. His earlier
impulsiveness and anger are replaced by a deep sense of inner peace, and he
learns to accept his suffering without bitterness. Aksionov’s character is
marked by his ability to forgive, as seen when he decides to forgive Makar, the
man who wrongfully imprisoned him, even after Makar confesses to the crime.
This forgiveness is a pivotal moment in his spiritual journey, demonstrating
his growth into a wise, compassionate, and selfless man.
Aksionov’s character embodies the themes of patience, faith, and
moral integrity. Despite his wrongful imprisonment and the suffering he
endures, he never seeks revenge or becomes consumed by anger. Instead, he
accepts his fate with grace and trust in God’s justice. By the end of the
story, Aksionov’s character is fully transformed, having moved beyond worldly
concerns and finding true freedom and peace in his spiritual growth. His
journey reflects the power of faith and the potential for redemption, even in
the most unjust and painful circumstances.
c. What is the theme of the story?
The central theme of "God Sees the Truth, But Waits" is the idea
of divine
justice and spiritual redemption. The story
explores how true justice may not always be immediately apparent in human terms,
but it is ultimately in God’s hands, and His timing is perfect. Aksionov, the
protagonist, suffers immensely due to his wrongful imprisonment, but through
his suffering, he undergoes a profound spiritual transformation. The theme
emphasizes that patience, faith, and acceptance of one’s fate can lead to inner
peace, even in the most unjust circumstances.
Another important theme in the story is forgiveness. Aksionov,
despite being wrongfully accused and enduring years of hardship, chooses to
forgive Makar, the man who reveals that he was the true murderer. This act of
forgiveness demonstrates Aksionov’s spiritual maturity and his understanding
that vengeance and anger only prolong suffering. The story also highlights the moral
consequences of guilt, as Makar’s confession is motivated by his growing remorse for
the wrong he has done.
Ultimately, the story teaches that suffering can
lead to personal growth and redemption. Aksionov’s
journey shows how hardship, though painful, can be a path to spiritual enlightenment,
leading to a deeper understanding of faith and God’s plan. The theme reinforces
that while human justice may fail, divine justice is always true and perfect,
and that spiritual growth can bring freedom, even when physical release from
suffering is not possible.
d. Which symbols are used in the story and what do they indicate?
In "God Sees the Truth, But Waits," several
symbols are used to convey deeper meanings related to the themes of justice,
faith, and transformation. Here are some key symbols in the story and their
significance:
1. Aksionov’s
White Hair: Aksionov’s white hair is a powerful symbol in the story. In the
beginning, when his wife dreams of him having white hair, it foreshadows the
years of suffering and hardship he will endure. Over time, the white hair
becomes a symbol of the heavy burden of his wrongful imprisonment, as well as
the passage of time and the spiritual transformation he undergoes. It signifies
his growth into a wiser, more patient, and spiritually enlightened man.
2. The Prison: The prison
symbolizes suffering, isolation, and spiritual testing. While it is a place of
punishment and despair, it also serves as the setting for Aksionov’s spiritual
growth. Through his time in prison, Aksionov learns patience, humility, and the
ability to forgive. The prison, therefore, symbolizes both the physical and
spiritual confinement that Aksionov endures, ultimately leading to his freedom
through faith and inner peace.
3. Aksionov’s
Beard and Appearance: Aksionov’s physical appearance, including his beard and his
overall worn-out look, symbolizes the transformation he undergoes. As he ages
and suffers, his appearance reflects his internal changes. By the end of the
story, his outward appearance mirrors the peace and serenity he has achieved
through his faith and forgiveness, showing how his character has evolved over
the years.
4. The
Confession of Makar: Makar’s confession symbolizes the weight of guilt and the
possibility of redemption. Makar’s confession to Aksionov reveals his deep
remorse and internal conflict. It also highlights the theme of divine justice,
as Makar’s guilt is exposed at the right moment, allowing Aksionov to make the
choice of forgiveness, which is a key part of his own spiritual growth. The
confession represents the moral consequences of wrongdoing and the potential
for repentance.
5. The Journey
to the Fair: Aksionov’s journey to the fair, which begins the chain of events
leading to his wrongful imprisonment, symbolizes the unpredictability of life
and the role of fate in human suffering. It also represents the tension between
worldly concerns and spiritual growth, as Aksionov’s initial focus is on his
business, but his path eventually leads him to a higher spiritual purpose.
Reference beyond the text
a. What role does religion play in Aksionov’s life? How does he undergo
a spiritual transformation in the story?
Religion plays a central role in Aksionov’s life, especially after
his wrongful imprisonment, where it becomes a source of strength, solace, and
transformation. Initially, Aksionov is a young man who enjoys worldly
pleasures, such as drinking and living a carefree life. However, after his
unjust conviction and the harsh years in the Siberian prison, he begins to
undergo a significant spiritual transformation. His faith becomes the anchor
that helps him cope with his suffering and navigate the deep emotional turmoil
of his situation.
Aksionov’s spiritual transformation begins during the early years
of his imprisonment, when he initially struggles with feelings of anger and
despair. He even contemplates suicide, overwhelmed by the unfairness of his
situation. However, he gradually turns to prayer and reflection, seeking solace
in his belief that God has a purpose for his life, even in the midst of
suffering. Over time, his faith deepens, and he becomes increasingly devoted to
God, finding peace in accepting his fate and trusting that divine justice will
prevail, even if it is not immediately visible. This shift from bitterness to
spiritual acceptance marks the beginning of his transformation.
The most significant moment in Aksionov’s spiritual journey comes
when he forgives Makar, the man who confesses to being
the true murderer. Despite the years of unjust suffering Aksionov has endured,
he chooses not to seek revenge. Instead, he prays for Makar and forgives him,
demonstrating his spiritual growth. This act of forgiveness shows Aksionov’s
understanding that vengeance is not the path to salvation, and that true
freedom and peace come from trusting in God’s will. By the end of the story,
Aksionov has undergone a complete transformation. His inner peace, patience,
and forgiveness reflect his deep faith, and he no longer desires to return to
his former life or family. He recognizes that spiritual clarity and redemption
are more meaningful than material success or physical freedom.
Aksionov’s spiritual journey reflects the theme that suffering can
lead to spiritual enlightenment, and through his deepening faith, he transcends
his wrongful imprisonment. His religion ultimately becomes the source of his
inner freedom, allowing him to endure hardship with grace and to experience
true liberation in his heart.
b. What does the story tell us about the existence of an unfair system
of justice?
"God Sees the Truth, But Waits" highlights
the existence of an unfair system of justice through Aksionov's wrongful
imprisonment, illustrating how human systems of justice can fail to deliver
fairness. Aksionov is accused of a crime he did not commit—the murder of a fellow
merchant—and despite his innocence, he is convicted and sent to a remote
Siberian prison. His experience reveals how easily the legal system can be
swayed by circumstantial evidence, personal bias, or the failure to conduct a
proper investigation, leading to the wrongful suffering of an innocent man.
The story critiques the limitations and imperfections of human
justice, showing that it can be blind to the truth, especially in the absence
of clear evidence or when individuals are quick to make assumptions. Aksionov’s
long years in prison, away from his family and home, are a painful reminder of
the flaws in the justice system. The fact that the true murderer, Makar, is
only revealed years later highlights how justice can be delayed or denied
altogether in an unfair system.
However, the story also suggests that while human justice is
fallible, divine justice is always
perfect. The idea that "God sees the truth, but waits" emphasizes
that, although earthly justice may fail, there is a higher moral order at play.
Aksionov’s journey toward spiritual enlightenment, and his eventual decision to
forgive Makar, demonstrates that true justice is not always immediate or
visible in the physical world, but it ultimately aligns with a greater divine
plan that transcends human error. This offers a sense of hope and redemption,
showing that, even in an unfair system, there can be eventual moral clarity and
reconciliation.
The Wish
Roald Dahl
"The Wish" by Roald
Dahl is a short story that demonstrates his signature mix of dark humor, clever
twists, and exploration of human nature.
About
the writer
Roald Dahl (1916–1990) was a British novelist, short story writer,
and poet, known for his children's books such as Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Matilda, and The BFG. His works often contain
elements of the macabre, with morally complex characters, and a sense of
mystery and surprise.
Setting
The story takes place in a seemingly ordinary environment, set in
a small town. Dahl’s stories often feature ordinary people or places that hold
secrets or have unexpected, dark twists beneath the surface. In this case, it’s
a quieter, rural setting that reflects the nature of the characters and their
interactions.
Plot
In The Wish, a boy named
George wants a new bike, but his mother insists he must first make a wish. She
tells him that whatever he wishes for, he must be careful because wishes can
have unforeseen consequences. George makes his wish, but his expectation is far
different from the outcome. He finds that getting what you want is not always
as simple or desirable as it seems.
The plot explores themes of desire, consequences, and the
unpredictability of wishes.
Characters
- George: The protagonist, a young boy who wants a bike and makes a
wish with unexpected consequences. He is innocent and curious but learns a
lesson about what happens when wishes are granted.
- George’s Mother: A practical and wise figure who cautions George about the
power of wishes. She plays an important role in shaping the story’s moral
lesson.
Themes
- The Consequences of Wishes: One of the central themes is the idea that wishes, while
tempting, come with unintended consequences. The story warns readers that
desires may not always lead to positive results.
- Greed and Selfishness: The character of George represents the human tendency to
want more, and the story reveals how greed can have a downside when one’s
desires are fulfilled without consideration of their true value.
- Innocence and Experience: Through George’s journey, we see a young character who
learns an important life lesson, transforming from innocence to a more
experienced understanding of his wishes and desires.
Summary
In The
Wish
by Roald Dahl, a young boy named George is eager to receive a new bicycle. One
day, while talking to his mother, she tells him that he should be careful about
what he wishes for, as wishes can come true in unexpected ways. George, though
skeptical, becomes intrigued by the idea of wishing for something and making it
happen. His mother encourages him to make a wish, which he does, thinking that
it will lead to the perfect outcome of getting the bicycle he desires.
When George makes his wish, he imagines the bike materializing
magically. However, the story takes a dark turn when his wish is granted, but
not in the way he expected. Instead of receiving a new bicycle, George finds
that the world around him changes in a way that makes him question his desire
for the bike. What seemed like an innocent wish soon reveals unforeseen
consequences, and George begins to realize that his wish might not have been
worth the cost.
As the story unfolds, George learns a valuable lesson about
desires and their outcomes. The consequences of his wish force him to confront
the idea that sometimes, getting exactly what you want can have a dark side.
Dahl plays with the theme of unintended results, showing how the fulfillment of
a wish can be a double-edged sword. George, once eager and innocent in his
wish, now understands that life is more complicated than simply desiring
something and having it granted.
In the end, The
Wish
serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked desire. It teaches
readers that they should be careful with their wishes, as they might lead to
unexpected or undesirable outcomes. Through George’s journey, Dahl explores the
complexities of human wishes, the risks involved in pursuing desires without fully
understanding the consequences, and the importance of thinking carefully before
making a decision.
Understanding the text
Answer the following questions.
a. What did the
child do to the scab on his knee?
The child gently picked the scab off
his cut with his finger nails and put it on his thigh. Finally he flipped it
with his finger.
b. What kind of effect did the carpet have on the child?
The child became extremely amazed to
see the red carpet. He had never really notice it before in such a way. The
different colors of carpet seemed to brighten mysteriously and spring out at
him in a most dazzling way. He was thoroughly lost in those colors and his
imagination.
c. What was he afraid of while walking across the carpet?
While
walking across the carpet in The Wish,
George is afraid of the strange, unsettling feeling it gives him. The carpet
seems to stretch and twist in a way that makes him nervous, as if it is pulling
him or trying to trap him. His fear intensifies as he senses something
unnatural about the carpet’s movement, symbolizing the discomfort and unease
that come with the unexpected consequences of his wish. This moment captures
his growing anxiety and realization that his desire for the bicycle may have
led to something far more frightening.
d. What motivated and encouraged the child to start and continue on his
journey?
In
The Wish, George is motivated to
start and continue on his journey by his desire to obtain a new bicycle. His
longing for the bike drives him to make a wish, believing that it will bring
him the happiness and satisfaction he craves. His mother encourages him to make
the wish, cautioning him that he must be careful with his desires, which adds
an element of curiosity and adventure for George. Initially, his excitement and
the belief that his wish will come true spur him on, even as the consequences
begin to unfold in strange and unsettling ways. Despite the growing discomfort
and fear, George’s curiosity and hope for his wish to be fulfilled keep him
moving forward, highlighting his naivety and determination.
e. What did the child see as he looked down on the black patterns of
the carpet?
As
George looked down at the black patterns on the carpet in The Wish, he saw strange and
disturbing shapes that seemed to shift and move. The patterns on the carpet
took on a life of their own, becoming almost hypnotic and unsettling. George’s
mind begins to play tricks on him, as the shapes appear to change and warp,
creating a sense of fear and confusion. This experience with the carpet
symbolizes the disorienting and unpredictable effects of his wish, where
something once familiar becomes unsettling and eerie, mirroring the story's
theme of the unintended consequences of desires.
Reference to the context
a. The writer creates two voices in the story. Who are they?
In The
Wish,
the two voices created by Roald Dahl are:
1. George's Voice
(the child): This is the internal voice of the young boy, George. Through his
perspective, we experience his desires, curiosity, and eventual realization of
the consequences of his wish. George’s voice is innocent, hopeful, and driven
by the excitement of wanting something. It captures his journey from wanting a
bike to confronting the unsettling outcomes of his wish.
2. The Voice of
George's Mother: This voice is that of the wise and cautionary figure in the
story. She advises George to be careful with his wish, warning him about the
power of desire and the unpredictable nature of wishes. Her voice introduces a
tone of wisdom and authority, guiding George (and the reader) toward
understanding the story’s deeper lesson about the consequences of unchecked desires.
b. Summarize the short story “The Wish” in about 200 words.
In The
Wish
by Roald Dahl, a young boy named George longs for a new bicycle and, encouraged
by his mother, makes a wish to get one. His mother warns him to be careful
about what he wishes for, hinting that wishes can have unforeseen consequences.
George, however, is eager for the bike and believes that his wish will be
granted exactly as he imagines. As he waits, he lies on the carpet and becomes
increasingly restless, observing the strange, shifting patterns on the floor.
The carpet seems to come alive, pulling him into a mysterious and uncomfortable
experience.
As George continues to look at the carpet, he becomes aware of how
his wish has created unexpected and eerie effects. The shapes on the carpet
shift in unsettling ways, symbolizing the dark consequences of his desire.
George begins to realize that the fulfillment of his wish is not as simple or
satisfying as he expected. His initial excitement and hope turn into fear and
confusion, making him question the true cost of getting what he wanted.
Through this story, Dahl explores themes of desire, unintended
consequences, and the unpredictability of wishes, ultimately showing that
fulfilling one's wishes may not always lead to the expected happiness.
c. The story shows the events through the eyes of the narrator and the
child. Comparing the two styles, who presents a more interesting or effective
view for the readers? Why?
In The
Wish,
both the narrator’s voice and George’s perspective offer valuable views, but
George’s point of view is more effective and engaging for the reader. His
perspective brings the story’s emotions and suspense to life. As a child,
George is full of innocence, excitement, and curiosity, which allows the reader
to experience the unfolding events with him. His internal conflict and gradual
realization of the unintended consequences of his wish resonate deeply,
creating a sense of tension and discomfort as he experiences these unsettling
changes. Through his eyes, the reader feels the growing unease, heightening the
impact of the story's themes.
While the narrator provides the overall context and describes
George's actions and surroundings, it is George’s voice that captures the
emotional essence of the story. The reader is drawn into his confusion, fear,
and realization, making his experience feel more vivid and immediate. The
child’s perspective makes the eventual twist in the story more powerful, as his
naïve expectations are turned upside down, revealing the deeper moral about the
risks of desires and wishes.
Thus, George’s point of view is more engaging and effective
because it evokes a stronger emotional response, drawing readers directly into
the story's unsettling atmosphere.
d. Is “The Wish” a story about self-confidence overcoming fear or about
greed? Give your arguments.
The
Wish
by Roald Dahl is primarily a story about greed rather than self-confidence overcoming fear.
While George experiences fear and discomfort as his wish takes unexpected
turns, the central theme revolves around the consequences of unchecked desire
and greed.
George's initial wish is driven by his longing for a new bicycle.
He desires it with great intensity, believing that having the bike will bring
him happiness. This desire for something more, without considering the possible
consequences, represents greed. His mother's warning about being careful with
wishes is a cautionary note about the dangers of wanting too much or focusing
solely on one's desires. As George's wish unfolds, he realizes that the
fulfillment of his wish comes with discomfort and fear, revealing that getting
what he wants isn’t as satisfying as he anticipated.
Although George experiences fear as the situation with the carpet
grows unsettling, the focus of the story is on how greed can lead to unexpected
and undesirable consequences. His wish, once granted, does not bring the joy he
hoped for, instead leading him to a realization about the dangers of unchecked
desires. Therefore, the story is more about greed and its negative outcomes
than about self-confidence overcoming fear.
Reference beyond the text
a. Do you think
our wish can be fulfilled? Why or why not?
The
idea of whether a wish can be fulfilled depends on various factors, such as the
nature of the wish, the effort put into achieving it, and the circumstances
surrounding it. In a literal sense, wishing for something doesn’t always
guarantee that it will come true, especially if the wish is unrealistic or
based purely on desire without any action to support it. However, in a more
metaphorical sense, our wishes or goals can often be fulfilled through hard
work, determination, and persistence.
For example, if someone wishes for success, it is more likely to
be fulfilled through focused effort, planning, and resilience rather than
waiting passively for success to happen. On the other hand, some wishes might
be beyond our control, like wishing for something that requires a change in
external factors or circumstances that we can’t influence.
In stories like The
Wish
by Roald Dahl, the fulfillment of a wish often comes with consequences or an
unexpected outcome, teaching readers that the act of wishing alone isn't always
enough—it is the choices we make and the actions we take that shape our
outcomes. So, while some wishes can be fulfilled, it’s important to recognize
that the process often involves more than just wishing; it requires effort,
patience, and careful consideration of the consequences.
b. Why do you think some people might have a frightening nature? What
would you suggest to them to overcome it?
Some people may have a frightening nature due to a variety of
reasons, often rooted in personal experiences, fears, or insecurities. People
with a frightening or intimidating demeanor might have faced challenging life
situations, such as trauma, rejection, or negative experiences, that shaped how
they interact with others. This can lead to defensive behavior, aggression, or
a lack of trust in others, which may make them appear frightening.
Additionally, certain personality traits like being highly assertive or
competitive can also contribute to an intimidating presence, even if the person
is not consciously trying to scare others.
To overcome a frightening nature, it’s important for individuals
to work on building self-awareness and emotional intelligence. Understanding
why they react in certain ways and acknowledging their fears or insecurities
can help them manage their behavior. Practicing empathy and learning to see situations
from others' perspectives can also soften their approach. Developing
communication skills, such as using a calm tone, open body language, and being
mindful of facial expressions, can help others feel more at ease.
Seeking support through therapy or counseling can also be
beneficial, especially if past trauma or deep-seated fears contribute to their
intimidating nature. Ultimately, overcoming a frightening nature requires
self-reflection, patience, and the willingness to make small, consistent changes
to how one interacts with others.
Civil Peace
Chinua Achebe
"Civil Peace" is a short
story written by Chinua Achebe, a renowned
Nigerian author known for his works that address issues of post-colonial
Africa, societal change, and the human condition. Achebe is best known for his
novel Things Fall Apart, which
explores the effects of colonialism on traditional African societies.
Setting
The story is set in post-civil war Nigeria, specifically in the
southeastern region. The events take place shortly after the Nigerian Civil
War, also known as the Biafran War (1967-1970), during a time of reconstruction
and uncertainty. The setting reflects the challenges faced by Nigerians in
rebuilding their lives after the devastating conflict, with themes of survival,
hope, and resilience emerging from the context of war’s aftermath.
Plot
The story centers on a man named Jonathan Iwegbu, a former
Biafran soldier, who survives the war and returns home to find his family and
his life in a state of recovery. Jonathan’s resilience and determination to
rebuild are evident as he starts a small business with the few resources he has
left. He finds his home intact, his wife and children alive, and a sense of
hope despite the war's devastation. However, his life takes another turn when a
group of thieves breaks into his home and demands money. Jonathan faces this
challenge with surprising calmness and wisdom, offering the thieves a small sum
without violence, showcasing his pragmatic approach to life in post-war
Nigeria.
Main Characters
- Jonathan Iwegbu: The protagonist of the story, Jonathan is a resilient and
optimistic man who, despite the horrors of war, focuses on rebuilding his
life. He represents the survival spirit of many people affected by war,
embodying themes of hope, endurance, and pragmatism.
- Maria: Jonathan’s wife, who supports him in rebuilding their lives
and shares in the hope of a better future. Together, they make the best of
what they have left after the war.
- The Thieves: A group of criminals who disrupt Jonathan’s peaceful life,
representing the continuing challenges that the people of Nigeria face
even in the aftermath of the civil war.
Themes
- Survival and Resilience: The central theme of Civil Peace is the resilience of individuals in the
face of adversity. Jonathan’s ability to find hope and rebuild after the
war illustrates the human capacity to survive, even in the most difficult
circumstances.
- Hope and Optimism: Despite the destruction caused by the civil war, Jonathan’s
optimistic attitude allows him to make the best of his situation. This
theme emphasizes the importance of maintaining hope in the face of
hardship.
- The Fragility of Peace: The story subtly highlights how peace, once achieved after
the war, remains fragile and subject to the uncertainties of life. The
break-in by thieves symbolizes the continuing instability and challenges
of post-war society.
- Materialism vs. Human Values: Jonathan’s response to the thieves—offering them money
without resistance—suggests that human life and peace are more valuable
than material possessions. His decision reflects a focus on personal
dignity and peace rather than the accumulation of wealth.
Summary
"Civil Peace" by Chinua
Achebe is a short story set in post-civil war Nigeria, focusing on Jonathan
Iwegbu, a man who considers himself extraordinarily lucky to have survived the
war with his wife, three of his four children, and his bicycle. Jonathan is a
symbol of resilience and optimism, grateful for the simple blessings he has.
After the war, he returns to his home and finds it still standing, albeit
slightly damaged. Jonathan begins using his bicycle to run a taxi service,
demonstrating his resourcefulness in difficult times.
Jonathan’s optimism is further rewarded when he receives an
ex-gratia payment of 20 pounds from the government for turning in rebel
currency. This unexpected windfall seems to promise a fresh start, reinforcing
Jonathan’s belief that “nothing puzzles God.” He uses the money to support his
family, reflecting his pragmatic approach to rebuilding their lives. Achebe
highlights the fragility of peace and the uneasy transition from war to
civilian life through Jonathan’s experiences.
However, the harsh realities of post-war society soon manifest
when a group of thieves arrives at Jonathan’s house, demanding the 20 pounds.
Despite Jonathan’s protests that he has no money, the thieves insist and
eventually accept 20 pounds as a bribe to leave his family unharmed. The tense
encounter underscores the lingering lawlessness and instability of the period,
revealing how ordinary people are forced to navigate threats with calm
resilience.
In the aftermath, Jonathan remains unfazed, maintaining his
positive outlook. He insists that the loss of money is insignificant compared
to the lives of his family. Achebe concludes the story with Jonathan’s
steadfast belief in moving forward, highlighting the theme of survival and
hope. “Civil Peace” ultimately reflects on the human capacity for endurance,
suggesting that true wealth lies in family, perseverance, and the ability to
adapt.
Understanding the text
Answer the following questions.
a. Why did Jonathan think of himself as ‘extraordinarily lucky’?
Jonathan thought of himself as "extraordinarily lucky"
because he and his family survived the Nigerian Civil War with minimal losses out
of his entire family, only one of his four children died during the war; which
he considered a blessing compared to the widespread devastation and loss
experienced by many others. Additionally, his house remained standing, albeit
slightly damaged, while many others had been destroyed.
Jonathan also felt fortunate to still possess his bicycle, which
he cleverly buried during the war to prevent it from being confiscated. After
the war, the bicycle became a valuable asset, allowing him to start a taxi
service and earn money. These factors contributed to Jonathan’s sense of
gratitude and reinforced his belief that life itself was the greatest fortune, regardless
of material wealth.
b. What are the ‘five blessings’ for which Jonathan is grateful?
The "five blessings" for which Jonathan is grateful are
his life, the lives of his wife, Maria, and the lives of his three surviving
children. Despite the hardships and losses caused by the Nigerian Civil War,
Jonathan considers the survival of his family to be a remarkable fortune.
These blessings symbolize the essence of Jonathan’s optimism and
resilience. To him, the safety and well-being of his family far outweigh any
material loss, reflecting his belief that life itself is the greatest treasure.
His gratitude for these five blessings shapes his positive outlook as he works
to rebuild his life after the war.
c. Why did Jonathan mistrust the officer who wanted to take his
bicycle? What does this tell you about the situation in Nigeria?
Jonathan
mistrusted the officer who wanted to take his bicycle because he recognized the
officer’s likely corruption and saw the demand as an opportunistic attempt to
exploit civilians. The officer’s vague justification of needing the bicycle for
“military purposes” seemed dubious, prompting Jonathan to bribe him to avoid
losing his valuable possession. This reflects the broader situation in post-war
Nigeria, where corruption, lawlessness, and abuse of power were widespread. The
war had weakened institutions, leaving ordinary people vulnerable to
exploitation by those in authority. Achebe uses this encounter to highlight how
survival often depended on navigating a fragile and morally compromised
society.
d. What visitors might be at the door? Are Jonathan and his wife
completely surprised? Explain.
The visitors at the door are a group of thieves who arrive in the
middle of the night, demanding Jonathan’s ex-gratia payment of 20 pounds.
Jonathan and his wife are not completely surprised by the visit, as they live
in a society struggling with instability and lawlessness after the war.
Although frightened, they seem to have anticipated the possibility of such
threats, which explains why they react with relative calm and try to negotiate
with the thieves.
Their experience reflects the harsh realities of post-war Nigeria,
where robbery and violence were common, and people had to remain vigilant.
Jonathan’s ability to stay composed and his willingness to part with the money
without resistance demonstrate his understanding that material possessions can
be replaced, but the safety of his family is paramount.
e. Why does no one in the neighborhood respond when the thieves pound
on Jonathan’s door? Why do the thieves call for the police?
No one in the neighborhood responds when the thieves pound on
Jonathan’s door because fear and a sense of helplessness pervade the community.
In post-war Nigeria, law enforcement was either absent or ineffective, and
people had grown accustomed to such incidents, choosing to avoid involvement to
protect them. The neighbors likely feared retaliation if they intervened,
reflecting the widespread insecurity and lack of trust in collective action.
The thieves mockingly call for the police, knowing full well that
no help will come. This act highlights the breakdown of law and order, as the
thieves exploit the absence of authority to intimidate Jonathan further. Their
sarcastic call underscores the irony and hopelessness of the situation,
emphasizing the chaotic and fragile nature of life in the aftermath of war.
Reference in the context
a. What does Jonathan mean by his expression “Nothing puzzles God”?
What does this expression reveal about his character? Explain by citing details
from the story.
In the story “Civil Peace”, Jonathan
uses this expression “Nothing puzzles God” every time when something miraculous
happens with him. He uses this line when he gets his bicycle back in fine
condition out of the ground. Next, he uses it when he finds his house is still
standing after the war. By “Nothing puzzles God” he means that anything can
happen, but Almighty God, being omniscient, is not surprised and puzzled by
anything which means that God knows each and every thing. The last time he uses
it at the end of the story after his family is robbed of the exgratia. This
expression reveals that he is quite optimistic person who has believed in God.
He feels too delighted to get miracles in his life. This expression also
reveals that he is a good person who enjoys everything he has but never laments
on his lose. Therefore, his character was optimistic, hopeful and religious.
b. How does Jonathan change as he experiences the conflicts in his
life? Explain.
As
Jonathan experiences conflicts in his life, he grows more resilient, adaptable,
and accepting of hardship. The war and its aftermath teach him to value what he
has rather than lament what he has lost. His resourcefulness in using his
bicycle for income and his gratitude for his surviving family reflect his
ability to find hope amid adversity. When confronted by thieves, Jonathan
remains calm and pragmatic, choosing to surrender his money rather than risk
his family’s safety. This response highlights his shift from clinging to
material possessions to prioritizing life and security. Ultimately, Jonathan’s
experiences shape him into a man who embraces peace and resilience, believing
that as long as he and his family survive, they can rebuild and move forward.
c. Nigerian English has words like soja ‘soldier’ and katakata
‘confusion’, ‘trouble’ derived apparently from English words but transformed by
native languages’ phonologies. What does the author’s use of dialect here add
to the story?
The author’s use of Nigerian English and dialect, with words like soja (soldier) and katakata (confusion, trouble), adds
authenticity and cultural richness to the story. By incorporating these
localized expressions, Achebe grounds the narrative in the lived experiences
and linguistic landscape of post-war Nigeria. This use of dialect reflects the
blending of English with native languages, capturing the voice of ordinary
Nigerians and highlighting the resilience and adaptability of the people.
The dialect also deepens the reader’s immersion in the setting,
emphasizing the socio-political realities faced by characters like Jonathan. It
conveys the informal, often chaotic nature of life in post-civil war Nigeria,
where official language and structures had eroded. Through this linguistic
choice, Achebe not only preserves the cultural identity of his characters but
also underscores the themes of survival and resourcefulness in the face of katakata.
d. Why do you think the thieves who come to rob Jonathan speak English
with a heavier African accent than Jonathan does?
The thieves speaking English with a heavier African accent than
Jonathan serves as a subtle reflection of their social position and character, while
Jonathan is portrayed as resourceful, hardworking, and striving to rebuild his
life after the war, the thieves represent lawlessness and exploitation. Their
heavier accent may suggest that they are less educated or have a lower social
status, potentially signaling their lack of refinement or formal upbringing.
In contrast, Jonathan's relatively lighter accent may indicate his
efforts to adapt to societal norms, as he is focused on survival and rebuilding
his family’s life. This linguistic difference underscores the divide between
individuals who are trying to make an honest living and those who exploit the
vulnerable. Additionally, it adds depth to the characters, illustrating that
even in a shared language; accents can reveal aspects of one’s background,
values, and actions.
f. The title of the story "Civil Peace" itself is ironical as
there is little to differentiate ‘civil peace’ from ‘civil war’. Do you think
that the title of this story is appropriate, or would “Civil War” have been a
better title? Explain.
The title "Civil Peace" is indeed ironic, as it highlights the
contrast between the ideal of peace and the harsh realities faced by the
characters in the aftermath of the Nigerian Civil War. While Jonathan considers
himself fortunate for surviving the war and tries to rebuild his life, the
conditions he faces—corruption, lawlessness, and violence—suggest that true peace
has not been fully achieved. The presence of thieves, exploitation, and a lack
of effective law enforcement illustrates that the aftermath of war has left the
society in a state of unstable and fragile peace.
Choosing "Civil Peace" as the title emphasizes the irony that
peace, though declared, is still tenuous and incomplete. It underscores the gap
between the official end of the war and the lived reality of the people, who
continue to struggle with the consequences of the conflict. While "Civil War" could have been
an appropriate title to reflect the destruction and violence of the past, "Civil Peace" effectively
captures the unresolved nature of the post-war situation, drawing attention to
the struggles that continue even after the war has ended. It highlights the
paradox of surviving a war but still facing conflict in daily life. Thus, the
title is fitting as it encapsulates the theme of fragile peace amidst ongoing
challenges.
Reference beyond the text
a. How would you describe the civil peace in Nigeria?
The
civil peace in post-war Nigeria is fragile and precarious, existing more as a
thin veneer over the deep scars left by the civil war. While the formal end of
the conflict brought an official sense of peace, the reality for many
Nigerians, like Jonathan, is far from serene. The country remains plagued by
corruption, lawlessness, and economic instability, with many people still
struggling to rebuild their lives. Though Jonathan’s family survives and makes
efforts to regain stability, they constantly face threats, such as robbery and
exploitation, reflecting the lack of true safety or order. This civil peace is
more about surviving in a broken system than enjoying the benefits of genuine
peace, highlighting the paradox of a society that is officially peaceful but
still deeply fractured and vulnerable.
b. What kind of attitude towards life do you think you would have if
your situation was similar to that of Jonathan’s?
If
my situation were similar to Jonathan's, I would likely adopt an attitude of
resilience, gratitude, and pragmatism. Like Jonathan, I would focus on
appreciating the things I still have—such as the safety of my loved ones and
the opportunity to rebuild—rather than dwelling on the losses endured. I would
approach life with a sense of resourcefulness, finding ways to make the best of
limited resources and adapting to new challenges as they arise. Jonathan’s
unwavering optimism, despite the hardships he faces, suggests that having a
strong sense of hope and prioritizing the well-being of family over material
wealth would be crucial in maintaining mental strength. I would likely embrace
a mindset focused on survival and forward movement, believing that even in
difficult circumstances, there is always the possibility of recovery and
growth.
c. Draw the character sketch of Jonathan Iwegbu.
Jonathan Iwegbu is a symbol of resilience and optimism in Chinua
Achebe’s "Civil Peace." A survivor
of the Nigerian Civil War, Jonathan considers himself “extraordinarily lucky”
because he and his family made it through the conflict relatively unharmed.
Despite losing one child, he feels fortunate that his wife, Maria, and three of
his children are alive, and that their house is still standing. His deep sense
of gratitude for the basic things—his family’s survival and the opportunity to
rebuild—is a central part of his character. Jonathan doesn’t dwell on his
losses but focuses on what remains, which gives him a unique perspective on
life.
Resourceful and practical, Jonathan immediately begins to rebuild
after the war by using his bicycle to offer taxi services. This willingness to
find practical solutions to challenges shows his adaptability in the face of
difficult circumstances. When he receives an unexpected ex-gratia payment of 20
pounds from the government, Jonathan’s first instinct is to invest it wisely to
further support his family. His pragmatic attitude is also reflected in his
calm approach to hardship, as he does not view the loss of material
possessions, like money, as catastrophic. He is more concerned with the
survival and well-being of his loved ones than with wealth or status.
Jonathan’s character is also defined by his unwavering optimism.
He constantly reassures himself and others that “nothing puzzles God,” showing
his faith that everything will work out in the end, no matter how dire the
situation may seem. Even when faced with threats, such as when thieves demand
his 20 pounds, Jonathan remains composed. Rather than reacting with anger or
fear, he negotiates and complies to protect his family’s safety. His ability to
stay calm in the face of danger reflects a mindset focused on survival and
finding peace, even in the most difficult of circumstances.
However, Jonathan’s calmness should not be mistaken for passivity.
He demonstrates courage when needed, such as when confronting the thieves, but
always prioritizes the well-being of his family over material losses. This
selflessness shows that, for Jonathan, family and the preservation of life are
more important than anything else. His resourcefulness, optimism, and ability
to remain focused on what truly matters make him a strong and enduring figure.
Ultimately, Jonathan Iwegbu embodies the values of resilience, hope, and
survival, providing a powerful example of how one can endure and rebuild in the
face of adversity.
6th
Story
Two Little Soldiers
Guy de Maupassant
"Two Little Soldiers" is a short
story by Guy de Maupassant, a French
writer known for his skillful depictions of human nature and his concise,
ironic style. The story is set in France during the Franco-Prussian
War,
a period of intense conflict between France and Prussia (now part of Germany)
in the late 19th century. Maupassant often used war settings to explore themes
of human folly, love, and loss.
Setting
The story is set against the backdrop of the Franco-Prussian
War,
specifically in a military camp where two young French soldiers are stationed.
The war serves as the larger context, influencing the soldiers' actions and the
dynamics between them. The setting of the camp, isolated from civilian life,
amplifies the themes of youth, war, and the disillusionment that arises from
such brutal experiences.
Plot
The plot revolves around two young
soldiers, Maurice and Louis, who are
close friends and share a bond of camaraderie forged in the hardships of war.
One day, the soldiers are invited by a young woman, whom they
both find attractive, to meet her at a distant location. After a brief meeting,
they both fall in love with her, and the story explores how their rivalry over
her affections escalates. Eventually, they decide to leave the army together
and be with her. However, their pursuit of love and happiness is tragically
interrupted when they die, leaving the fate of their relationship with the
woman unresolved.
Characters
- Maurice and Louis are the two
protagonists, young soldiers caught in the confusion and brutality of war.
Their bond as friends is tested by their romantic rivalry, but ultimately,
their youth and immaturity lead to tragic consequences.
- The young woman
they both love remains somewhat of an enigmatic figure in the story. She
is a catalyst for their actions but is not deeply developed as a character
herself. Her interaction with the soldiers reflects the fleeting nature of
relationships during wartime.
- The narrator is
an observer who provides insight into the soldiers’ lives and their
actions, but the story mainly focuses on the two protagonists.
Themes
- The Futility of War: The story illustrates the senselessness of war and the
fragility of life. Maurice and Louis are both young men whose lives are
cut short by war, and their rivalry over a woman becomes a tragic
commentary on how war disrupts human relationships and destroys the
potential for happiness.
- Youth and Innocence: The soldiers are depicted as young, innocent, and full of
hope, yet their lives are shaped by the harshness of war. Their rivalry
over the woman represents the immaturity and emotional turmoil of youth,
which is ultimately overshadowed by the larger tragedy of the war.
- Love and Rivalry: The story explores the theme of love and the complex
emotions that can arise from it, such as jealousy, rivalry, and the search
for validation. The soldiers’ feelings for the woman and their competition
for her attention symbolize the intense and sometimes irrational nature of
love.
- Irony and Tragedy: Maupassant’s use of irony highlights the absurdity of the
soldiers’ situation. Their attempts to seek love and escape the horrors of
war only lead to their untimely deaths, underscoring the tragic futility
of their actions.
Summary
Two Little Soldiers by Guy de
Maupassant is a short story set during the Franco-Prussian War, focusing on two
young French soldiers, Luc and Jean. These two soldiers are childhood friends
who have joined the military to fight in the war. They are stationed at a small
outpost and pass their time together, sharing the same fears, hopes, and
dreams. The bond between Luc and Jean is close, and despite the hardships of
war, they provide each other with comfort and companionship. Their youth and
innocence contrast sharply with the grim realities of the war they are
enduring.
One day, Luc and Jean meet a young milkmaid, a beautiful and
charming woman, who works in the area. She catches their attention and quickly
becomes the object of their affection. The milkmaid is depicted as kind,
pleasant, and simple, embodying the purity and serenity that the soldiers long
for amidst the violence and devastation of war. The soldiers, tired of the
brutality of the conflict, both develop feelings for her, and their friendship
begins to shift as they start competing for her attention and favor.
The milkmaid, who is aware of the soldiers’ admiration for her,
begins to play a role in the growing rivalry between Luc and Jean. They begin
to visit her regularly, and their feelings for her deepen. The milkmaid is not
oblivious to the soldiers' competition, but her affection remains ambiguous.
She seems to enjoy the attention from both men, leading to increasing tension
between the two soldiers. What initially started as innocent admiration soon
turns into an intense rivalry, with each soldier hoping to win her love.
As the story progresses, the rivalry between Luc and Jean
intensifies. Their bond, once unbreakable, begins to fray as they become
consumed by their feelings for the milkmaid. The tension reaches a breaking
point when both soldiers decide to confront the situation, each thinking that
the other is a threat to his chances of winning the milkmaid’s affection.
However, the tragic irony of the story comes when both soldiers, in their quest
for her love, end up making a fateful decision that leads to their untimely
deaths. The milkmaid, who had never truly committed to either of them, remains
unaffected by the tragic outcome.
In the end, Luc and Jean’s rivalry, driven by their feelings for
the milkmaid, ends in futility and loss. The story illustrates the tragic
absurdity of human desires and the futility of war. Maupassant uses the
characters of Luc, Jean, and the milkmaid to explore themes of youth, love,
rivalry, and the senselessness of conflict. Their actions, motivated by
fleeting emotions, ultimately lead to their deaths, highlighting the fragility
of life and the irony of their situation. Through this tragic tale, Maupassant
reflects on how human beings often let trivial matters, like love or jealousy,
take precedence over the larger, more meaningful aspects of life.
Understanding the text
Answer these questions.
a. Why do the two
soldiers spend their free time on Sundays away from the barrack out in the
countryside?
The
two soldiers spend their free time on Sundays away from the barracks in the
countryside to escape the rigid structure and stress of military life. The
tranquil, open space of the countryside offers them a much-needed break,
providing solitude and a peaceful environment where they can unwind and
reflect. It allows them to reconnect with nature, find a sense of freedom, and
engage in personal activities or hobbies that might not be possible within the
confines of the barracks. This time away helps them recharge mentally and
emotionally, offering a brief respite from the demands of their duties and the
pressures of military life.
b. Why does the girl become the topic of conversation for these
soldiers?
The
girl becomes the topic of conversation for the soldiers because she likely
stands out to them in some way, drawing their attention. She might possess
qualities that intrigue them—whether it's her physical appearance, her
behavior, or a personal interaction they had with her. In a setting where
soldiers have limited social interaction outside their comrades, they may
become fixated on something or someone that deviates from the norm, creating
curiosity or speculation. Additionally, in their idle moments, discussing a
person like her could provide an escape from the monotony of military life and
serve as a source of entertainment or distraction.
c. Why does deception enter into their friendship?
Deception
enters into their friendship because one or both soldiers may feel the need to
hide their true intentions or feelings, possibly due to fear of judgment or the
desire to protect themselves. In a close-knit environment like the military,
where trust and loyalty are emphasized, they might feel compelled to present
themselves in a certain way to maintain their bond or avoid conflict. Deception
could also stem from jealousy, competition, or a desire to gain favor with the
girl, leading them to conceal their true thoughts or actions. Ultimately, the
presence of deception may reflect deeper insecurities or desires that threaten
the authenticity of their friendship.
d. Do you think that Luc is a betrayer of friendship?
Based
on the context you've provided, Luc could be considered a betrayer of
friendship if his actions involve deceit, selfish motives, or manipulation that
harms his friend. If Luc hides the truth, takes advantage of his friend’s
trust, or puts his own desires ahead of the well-being of the friendship, these
behaviors would suggest betrayal. Friendship relies on honesty, loyalty, and
mutual respect, so any violation of these principles especially for personal
gain would lead to the breakdown of trust, making Luc's actions feel like a
betrayal. However, the full extent of his betrayal would depend on the specific
circumstances and motivations behind his actions.
e. What is the cause of suicide of Jean? Do you think that it was the
only release of his love?
The cause of Jean's suicide could stem from a combination of
emotional turmoil, unrequited love, feelings of betrayal, and perhaps a sense
of hopelessness. If Jean had fallen deeply in love with someone, possibly the
girl or his friend, and found his feelings unreciprocated or betrayed, it might
have driven him to a state of emotional distress. The complexity of his
relationships especially if there was deception or unspoken tension could have
created a sense of isolation, where suicide seemed like the only way to escape
his overwhelming emotions.
As for whether suicide was the only release of his love, it seems
that Jean might have viewed it as the only way to express or resolve his
feelings. However, suicide is rarely the only way to cope with emotional pain;
it often reflects a moment of profound despair. There might have been other
ways for Jean to release his love, such as through communication, finding
support from others, or finding meaning in other aspects of life, but in his
moment of crisis, he may have felt that there were no alternatives. His tragic
end highlights the complexity of love, loss, and mental health struggles,
showing that sometimes individuals in deep emotional pain cannot see past their
immediate distress.
Reference to the context
a. What is the central theme of the story?
The
central theme of the story appears to be the complexities of love, friendship,
and betrayal. It explores the emotional conflicts that arise within
relationships, where feelings of affection, desire, and jealousy can lead to
misunderstandings, deception, and ultimately, tragic outcomes. The characters
are likely grappling with their inner turmoil, trying to navigate their desires
and personal connections in an environment that intensifies their emotions. At
the heart of the story is the idea that human relationships are fragile and can
be easily disrupted by unspoken truths, lies, or unrequited love, often leading
to feelings of isolation, despair, and, in extreme cases, self-destruction.
d. Two Little Soldiers can be viewed as a series of dramatic scenes.
Describe the story as tragedy.
Two
Little Soldiers can indeed be viewed as a tragedy, as it centers around themes of
love, betrayal, and the inevitable consequences of emotional turmoil. The story
unfolds as a series of dramatic moments that escalate in intensity, ultimately
leading to a tragic end.
At the heart of the tragedy is the relationship between the two
soldiers, who initially share a strong bond of friendship but are soon tested
by deception and unspoken desires. Their connection is strained when they both
fall for the same girl, and their rivalry and jealousy intensify as they
attempt to win her affection. In this tense environment, they begin to deceive
one another, each hiding their true feelings or intentions, which create
emotional chaos.
The tragic element deepens when one of the soldiers, Jean, unable
to bear the pain of unrequited love and the betrayal he perceives, takes his
own life. His death underscores the profound emotional devastation that can
arise from unresolved conflicts and the crushing weight of rejection and
loneliness. The soldiers' bond, once strong, is shattered by their actions,
leading to a sense of irreversible loss.
The story emphasizes the fragility of human relationships, showing
how love and friendship can quickly turn into sources of deep pain and regret.
Jean’s suicide serves as the tragic climax, illustrating the destructive power
of emotional vulnerability and the fatal consequences of miscommunication,
jealousy, and deceit. In the end, Two
Little Soldiers is a poignant reflection on the dark side of human emotions,
highlighting the tragedy that can result from unaddressed longing and the
inability to cope with the complexities of love and loyalty.
e. What is the setting and style of the story?
The
setting of Two Little Soldiers is
within a military barracks and the surrounding countryside, contrasting the
rigid, disciplined environment of the soldiers' daily lives with the freedom
and emotional complexity of their personal struggles. The barracks represent
confinement and routine, while the countryside offers a temporary escape. The
style of the story is simple yet emotionally charged, focusing on the internal
conflicts of the characters and the subtle tensions in their interactions. The
narrative is marked by concise language and quiet, reflective moments, allowing
the deeper emotional layers of love, jealousy, and betrayal to unfold through
dialogue and actions rather than overt exposition. This minimalist approach
heightens the emotional intensity, emphasizing the tragic consequences of the
characters' unspoken desires and the fragility of their relationships.
f. How would you describe the conflict between the friends?
The
conflict between the friends in Two Little Soldiers
is rooted in rivalry, jealousy, and deception, ultimately straining their bond
to the point of breaking. Initially, the two soldiers share a strong
friendship, but the arrival of the girl introduces a deep emotional conflict
between them. Both soldiers fall for her, and their once-solid friendship
becomes tangled in unspoken competition for her affection. This rivalry
intensifies as their emotions clash, with each soldier hiding his true
feelings, deceiving the other to maintain an advantage. The tension between
them escalates, revealing their vulnerabilities, insecurities, and desires. As
they betray one another’s trust, their friendship deteriorates, and the
conflict culminates in tragic consequences. The emotional conflict between the
friends is not only about love for the girl but also about their own sense of
pride, loyalty, and personal identity, which ultimately leads to a devastating
rupture.
Reference beyond the text
a. Is it good to have conflict between
friendship and love? Is it morally good that a person and his best friend can
love the same person?
No, it is not ideal to have conflict between friendship and love,
as it often creates emotional strain and complicates relationships. When love
and friendship collide, it can lead to jealousy, resentment, and
misunderstandings. Such conflicts can damage both the romantic relationship and
the bond of friendship if not addressed with care and maturity. Ideally, love
and friendship should complement each other, not compete against one another,
and when they do clash, it often requires open communication, empathy, and
self-awareness to navigate.
Yes, it is not morally wrong for a person and their best friend to
both falls in love with the same person, as love is an uncontrollable emotion.
The moral aspect depends on how the individuals handle the situation. If they
approach it with respect, honesty, and consideration for each other’s feelings,
it can be a complex but navigable scenario. The moral dilemma arises when
either person behaves selfishly, manipulates the situation, or disregards the
impact of their actions on the friendship and the other person involved. How
they choose to handle their emotions is what determines whether it is morally
acceptable or harmful.
b. How would you describe the triangular love?
Triangular love refers to a complex emotional situation where
three individuals are involved in a love dynamic, often characterized by a
conflict of interests, desires, or feelings. The most common form of triangular
love involves two people vying for the affection of a third, which creates
tension, jealousy, and competition. In this scenario, the emotions and
relationships of all three individuals become entangled, leading to a
complicated and often painful situation.
Psychologist Robert Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love further describes this concept, identifying three key components
of love: intimacy, passion, and commitment. These components can manifest in
different ways within the love triangle, making it more challenging to
navigate. For example, one person might experience deep emotional intimacy with
one person while feeling passionate about another. The triangular love dynamic
often creates a moral and emotional dilemma, as each person’s desires and
loyalties clash, making it difficult to balance love and maintain healthy
relationships.
7th Story
An Astrologers Day
R.K.
Narayan
An
Astrologer's Day is a short story by Indian writer R.K. Narayan, first published
in 1947 as part of his collection of short stories. It showcases Narayan's
mastery in creating simple, yet profound narratives that explore human nature,
culture, and the complexities of everyday life. Here's a breakdown of the
story:
About the Writer
R.K. Narayan (1906-2001) was one of India's most prominent and
respected English-language writers. He is best known for his works set in the
fictional South Indian town of Malgudi, where many of his stories unfold.
Narayan’s writing is often noted for its simplicity, humor, and deep insight
into human behavior and Indian society. His works include novels like Swami and Friends, The Guide, and The Man-Eater of Malgudi.
Setting
The story is set in Malgudi, Narayan’s fictional town that serves
as the backdrop for many of his stories. The setting is crucial as it
represents a typical Indian town with its street markets, bustling crowds, and
the simple life of its inhabitants. The events of An Astrologer's Day take place
at night in a busy street, where the astrologer operates his small stall,
performing his duties and interacting with passersby.
Plot
The plot revolves around an astrologer who makes a living by
telling people's fortunes. One evening, he encounters a stranger who seeks his
services. The astrologer gives the man a prediction that profoundly impacts
both of them. Through a series of conversations, it is revealed that the
astrologer had once tried to kill a man, unknowingly that the man seeking his
advice is the same person he had harmed years ago. The story culminates in a
twist, with the astrologer realizing the significance of his encounter,
offering him a chance for redemption, and leaving him to ponder the deeper
meanings of life.
Characters
1. The
Astrologer: He is a clever, perceptive man who uses his knowledge of
people's lives to earn a living. Despite his outward confidence, he is burdened
by his past and the mistake he made years ago. He is pragmatic, yet has a deep
understanding of human nature.
2. The Stranger: The man who
comes to the astrologer for help, seeking answers about his future. He is tense
and troubled, unaware of the astrologer's past actions. In the end, his
encounter with the astrologer reveals a crucial twist in the story.
3. The
Astrologer's Wife: While she doesn't play a major role in the story, she provides
some insight into the astrologer's character and his work, as she is the one
who subtly supports his life and helps him in his dealings with customers.
Themes
1. Fate vs. Free
Will:
The story examines the tension between fate and free will, suggesting that
while people believe in astrology to predict their future, their actions and
choices can still alter their paths. The astrologer himself is an example of
someone who is caught between the two, struggling with his own fate and past
actions.
2. Redemption
and Guilt: The astrologer’s past mistake, when he unknowingly caused harm
to the stranger, is a significant aspect of the story. The encounter gives him
an opportunity for redemption and reflection on the consequences of his
actions. The theme of guilt and the chance to make amends is central to the
narrative.
3. Deception and
Truth: The astrologer's profession is based on the art of deception,
yet he unknowingly confronts the truth of his own past. The story explores how
truth and deception intermingle, and how even those who deal in falsehoods may
be confronted with truth in unexpected ways.
4. Human Nature: The story
highlights Narayan's deep understanding of human nature, showing how people are
driven by their fears, desires, and the search for meaning. The astrologer’s
interaction with the stranger reveals the vulnerabilities and complexities of
human life.
Summary
An
Astrologer's Day by R.K. Narayan follows the life of an astrologer who works in
the streets of Malgudi, a fictional town in South India. The astrologer is a
self-assured man who earns his living by telling people's fortunes. He is
dressed in a traditional manner, sitting under a makeshift stall and attracting
customers with his mystical persona. While his practice is based on predicting
the future, he carefully observes people’s behavior and uses his intuition to
offer them advice, often tailoring his predictions to what he senses they need
to hear. This makes him a successful and popular figure in the town, although
he harbors a hidden past that weighs on him.
One day, a stranger approaches the astrologer seeking answers to
his future. The astrologer examines the man closely and senses that he is
troubled and tense. After a brief exchange, the astrologer confidently tells
the man that he has a terrible past, particularly a violent encounter that has
led to deep anguish. The stranger is shocked at the accuracy of the prediction.
The astrologer then goes on to give the man a detailed, cryptic prophecy about
how his future will unfold. He suggests that the stranger's life will soon take
a positive turn, and he gives him hope for a better future.
As the astrologer continues his predictions, the story reveals a
twist. The astrologer, who has been living with a deep secret for many years,
begins to realize that the stranger he is talking to is the very man he had
once nearly killed in his youth. The astrologer had been involved in a violent
confrontation with a man long ago, and he fled the town in guilt and fear,
starting a new life as an astrologer. The stranger’s appearance is a reminder
of his past crime, and he experiences a rush of emotions as he realizes that he
is face to face with the man he had wronged.
In the end, the astrologer’s encounter with the stranger serves as
both a moral reckoning and a moment of personal redemption. The astrologer, who
once fled his past, now finds himself in a position to make amends—though not in
the way he initially expects. The stranger, unaware of the astrologer's true
identity, takes comfort in the predictions and leaves, seemingly at peace with
the new direction his life is heading. The astrologer, left alone with his
thoughts, reflects on how fate has brought them together and how his past
mistake, once hidden, has come full circle. The story ends with the astrologer
contemplating the nature of fate, guilt, and the unexpected ways in which life
unfolds.
Understanding the text
Answer the following questions.
a. How does the
astrologer’s appearance help him attract customers? How does he help the
customers satisfy their needs?
The astrologer’s appearance plays a key role in attracting
customers to his stall. He is dressed in traditional, eye-catching attire,
which includes a turban and a long robe, both of which enhance his mystique and
lend an air of authority. His physical appearance, coupled with his calculated
gestures and the use of props like a palm leaf, adds to the aura of wisdom and
mysticism. His enigmatic and well-thought-out presentation helps to create an
atmosphere of trust and intrigue, making people believe that he holds deep,
secret knowledge about their lives and futures. This appearance makes him stand
out in the busy market and draws people in, eager to know what he can reveal
about their future.
The astrologer’s ability to help his customers satisfy their needs
is rooted in his skill at reading people. He doesn’t merely rely on traditional
astrology but uses his keen observation of their body language, demeanor, and
emotions to tailor his predictions. This makes his advice seem particularly
relevant and accurate. For example, he intuitively senses the troubled state of
the stranger who approaches him, which allows him to make specific, personal
predictions that resonate with the man. The astrologer is adept at offering
comfort and reassurance, giving people what they need—whether it's guidance, a
sense of hope, or a way to cope with their troubles. In doing so, he satisfies
the emotional needs of his clients, even if his predictions may not always be
grounded in the traditional practices of astrology. This blend of psychological
insight and perceived mysticism allows him to effectively meet the desires and
concerns of his customers.
b. How do you characterize the astrologer’s attitude toward the
stranger?
The
astrologer's attitude toward the stranger is initially one of professional
detachment and confidence. He approaches the stranger with a sense of
authority, relying on his skills to provide tailored predictions. As a seasoned
astrologer, he calmly assesses the stranger’s demeanor and offers predictions
that seem accurate and comforting, maintaining an air of control. However, as
the conversation progresses, the astrologer’s attitude shifts to unease and
inner turmoil when he realizes that the stranger is the very man he had wronged
years ago. This realization evokes a deep sense of guilt and self-reflection,
though he keeps his emotions hidden. His attitude, therefore, evolves from
professional confidence to quiet remorse, as he is forced to confront his past
without openly acknowledging it to the stranger.
c. What details does the astrologer give the stranger about his past?
The
astrologer gives the stranger several unsettling details about his past,
revealing that the man had a violent and traumatic experience involving a
near-fatal encounter. He correctly deduces that the stranger had been seriously
wounded in the past, and that this violent incident had caused him immense
anguish. The astrologer also suggests that the stranger had been searching for
answers ever since, carrying a deep sense of unresolved guilt and sorrow. He
implies that the stranger has been unable to move on from this dark episode in
his life. These revelations seem eerily accurate to the stranger, though the
astrologer remains unaware that he is speaking about an event in which he
himself played a part years earlier.
d. Why does he advise the stranger to go home immediately?
The
astrologer advises the stranger to go home immediately after revealing the
details of his violent past and predicting that his life will soon change for
the better. The astrologer senses that the stranger has been carrying a heavy
emotional burden and needs to resolve the pain from his past. By urging him to
go home, the astrologer seeks to give the man the opportunity to find peace and
closure. The advice also stems from the astrologer's own unease and guilt upon
realizing that the stranger is the very man he had wounded years ago. In his
mind, the astrologer believes that by sending the man home, he might avoid
further confrontation or retribution, and perhaps allow the stranger to heal
from the trauma he has suffered. The astrologer’s recommendation is thus
motivated by both a sense of compassion and a desire to distance himself from
the consequences of his own past actions.
e. What is your reaction to the conversation between the astrologer and
his wife?
The
conversation between the astrologer and his wife is revealing in its simplicity
and subtle humor, showcasing the dynamics of their relationship. The wife
appears to be practical and supportive, helping her husband prepare for his
day’s work by giving him a meal and offering some gentle advice. Her concern
for him is evident, yet there is also an underlying tone of realism in her
words. The astrologer’s response to her, while somewhat dismissive, also
reflects his internal struggles. He seems to take pride in his work and is
confident in his ability to manage his customers, but his wife’s questions
about the nature of his work and its consequences subtly hint at his deeper
moral conflict. This brief exchange adds depth to his character, showing that
while he presents himself as a confident, wise figure in public, at home, he is
a man who is, at times, burdened by the nature of his profession and his past.
It also highlights the contrast between the astrologer's outward persona and
the more mundane, everyday reality of his life with his wife.
Reference to the context
a. Suspense is the feeling of anticipation you may have as you read. In this
story, what details contributed to your feelings of suspense and surprise?
Explain.
In An
Astrologer's Day, several details contribute to the feeling of suspense and
surprise. First, the astrologer's initial air of confidence and the mysterious
setting of the street create a sense of intrigue. When the stranger approaches,
the astrologer's ability to provide accurate predictions about the man's past
creates an atmosphere of tension, especially as the astrologer seems to know
details about the stranger's life that he couldn't have learned through normal
means. The stranger's emotional reaction to the astrologer's revelations,
coupled with the astrologer's calm demeanor, heightens the sense of suspense,
making readers wonder how much the astrologer truly knows.
The major element of surprise comes when the astrologer realizes
that the stranger is the very man he had once nearly killed. This realization
occurs gradually, and the astrologer’s growing unease and inner turmoil
contribute to a sense of impending revelation. The tension intensifies as the
astrologer, who has been living in guilt and fear for years, confronts the
possibility of facing the consequences of his past actions. The twist at the
end where the stranger, unaware of the astrologer's identity, leaves satisfied create
an ironic and unexpected resolution. This final revelation leaves readers
reflecting on the nature of fate and the impact of past mistakes, making the
story's conclusion both suspenseful and surprising.
b. Analyze the conflicts in “An Astrologer’s Day.” Explain how the
conflicts are resolved and what they reveal about the characters involved in
the story.
In
An Astrologer's Day, the main
conflict is internal, centered on the astrologer’s guilt over a violent
incident from his past, and external, involving his interaction with the
stranger. The astrologer is burdened by the memory of having nearly killed the
stranger years ago, and he is fearful of facing the consequences. As the
conversation unfolds, the astrologer realizes that the stranger is the very man
he had harmed. This external conflict intensifies as the astrologer struggles
with the fear of retribution. The resolution comes when the astrologer, still
hiding his identity, advises the stranger to go home and find peace, avoiding a
direct confrontation. This resolution allows the astrologer to maintain his
safety, but it also leaves him to reflect on the moral complexities of his past
actions. The conflict reveals the astrologer's internal struggle with guilt and
his desire for redemption, while also highlighting his skill in navigating
difficult situations without directly addressing his past mistakes.
d. Description helps readers visualize what is happening in a story.
What details and techniques does the author use to describe the astrologer?
In An
Astrologer's Day, R.K. Narayan uses several vivid details and techniques to
describe the astrologer, helping readers visualize both his physical appearance
and his role in the story. The astrologer is depicted as a man dressed in
traditional, colorful attire, which adds to his mystique and conveys his status
as a figure of wisdom and authority. His "turban" and "long robe"
immediately create an image of a man steeped in the cultural and spiritual
practices of his profession. The author also describes the astrologer's
"squat frame" and "a calm, reassuring expression," giving
him a humble yet composed appearance. These physical traits contrast with his
deep inner turmoil, which Narayan subtly reveals through his nervousness when
interacting with the stranger, especially when he realizes the stranger's
identity.
The astrologer’s environment also reflects his persona. His stall
is described as a makeshift setup, with a simple "brightly colored
cloth" to shield him from the sun, enhancing the impression of a man who
is part of the town’s everyday life, yet holds a certain mystical aura.
Additionally, Narayan describes his demeanor as confident, yet his nervousness
and uncertainty about his past make his characterization more complex. The
author uses these descriptions to build a sense of intrigue and to highlight
the contrast between the astrologer's public role as a confident fortune-teller
and his private, moral struggle. These details and techniques help readers
visualize the astrologer and understand the dual nature of his character—one of
outward calm, with a hidden, troubled past.
e. Irony is a contrast between appearances and reality. What is ironic
about Guru Nayak’s meeting with the astrologer?
The irony in Guru Nayak’s meeting with the astrologer lies in the
contrast between appearances and reality. At first, the astrologer confidently
makes predictions about the stranger’s past, detailing a violent incident and
the stranger’s troubled life. Guru Nayak, who is eager for answers, believes
the astrologer’s words and is reassured, unaware that the astrologer is
actually the man who nearly killed him years ago. The astrologer, on the other
hand, is hiding his identity, all the while feeling an intense inner conflict
as he recognizes Guru Nayak. The true irony emerges when Guru Nayak leaves the
astrologer’s stall, unaware that the man who gave him the prophecy is the very
one he had been seeking for revenge.
Moreover, the astrologer’s prediction about the stranger’s future,
which suggests that Guru Nayak will find peace and resolution, is ironic
because, in reality, the astrologer is the one who might be seeking peace from
his past actions. This contrast between what is said and what is true heightens
the dramatic tension, as both the astrologer and Guru Nayak are deceived by
their own assumptions and perceptions. The irony lies in how their meeting
resolves without either of them fully understanding the true nature of their
connection.
f. How does the astrologer’s manner of dress suit his character?
The astrologer’s manner of dress suits his character by enhancing
the aura of mysticism and authority he wants to project. He wears a turban and
a long robe, which are traditional, colorful garments that immediately signal
to the people of the town that he is a figure of wisdom and spiritual
significance. His attire aligns with the role he plays as a fortune-teller,
evoking a sense of reverence and respect. The turbans and robes are symbolic of
the cultural and spiritual identity that is expected of an astrologer in the
context of the story.
His dress also contrasts with his inner turmoil, adding depth to
his character. While his appearance is confident and commanding, the
astrologer’s true nature is much more complex. The fact that he uses his dress
to conceal his true self—hiding his past and projecting an image of stability reflects
the tension between his public persona and private guilt. The traditional dress
aids in establishing his credibility with customers, allowing him to maintain
his role as a trusted figure, even as he harbors emotional and moral conflicts
beneath the surface. Thus, his manner of dress is both a reflection of the role
he plays in society and a tool for hiding the complexity of his inner life.
Reference beyond the text
a. The astrologer
attracts many customers in the street who are pleased and astonished by what he
tells them. What does this tell you about the people of the town walking in the
street?
The fact that the astrologer attracts many customers in the
street, who are pleased and astonished by his predictions, suggests that the
people of the town are deeply inclined toward seeking spiritual guidance and
reassurance about their lives. It indicates that they are curious and perhaps
somewhat superstitious, looking for answers to their personal dilemmas or
uncertainties. The crowd’s positive reactions to the astrologer’s words show
that they place trust in his abilities, believing in the power of fate and the
mysticism surrounding his predictions.
This also reflects the social and cultural context of the town,
where astrology and fortune-telling are respected traditions, and people are
willing to seek comfort in these practices. The customers’ astonishment and
satisfaction point to their vulnerability and need for validation, as they
often look to external sources to make sense of their lives or solve their
problems. Overall, the reaction of the townspeople reveals their openness to
believing in the supernatural and their need for guidance, even if it comes
from a figure like the astrologer, whose predictions may not always be grounded
in truth.
b. Why do most people want to know their future? Do you think
astrologers can really help them know their future?
Most people want to know their future because it provides them
with a sense of control and security. The uncertainty of life can be
unsettling, and by seeking knowledge about the future, individuals hope to gain
insight into potential outcomes, make better decisions, and alleviate their
anxieties. The desire to understand what lies ahead can stem from various
concerns—ranging from career choices, relationships, and health, to more
existential fears about purpose and destiny. In essence, knowing the future can
offer comfort, reduce stress, and help people navigate their lives with greater
confidence.
As for whether astrologers can really help people know their
future, it’s important to recognize that astrology is not scientifically proven
to predict specific events. Astrologers often provide general guidance that can
resonate with a person’s current circumstances, and their advice may appear
accurate due to the nature of their broad, symbolic predictions. The real power
of an astrologer, however, may lie in their ability to offer emotional support,
insight, and a different perspective. While they might not predict the future
in a literal sense, they can help people by offering reassurance, clarity, or a
sense of direction—whether or not their predictions hold any true accuracy.
c. Is astrology a good practice of fortune telling or is it just a
blind faith? Give reasons.
Yes,
astrology can be considered a form of blind faith because it lacks scientific
backing and relies heavily on belief in the influence of celestial bodies on
human lives. Despite its long history and cultural significance in many
societies, astrology does not have empirical evidence to support its claims of
predicting specific events or outcomes. Many of the predictions made by
astrologers are often vague, generalized, or based on broad principles that
could apply to anyone, leading people to find meaning where there may be none.
This can make astrology seem like a way to offer comfort or direction, but in
reality, it does not provide concrete, reliable information. While some people
may find emotional support or personal insight through astrology, it is
important to recognize that its practices are rooted in belief rather than
verifiable truth, making it a practice more of faith than of fact.
No comments:
Post a Comment